We hope and pray that God will put a stop to this insane NWO Agenda - see - Future NWO Laws to save the planet -

NEW AUSTRALIAN POLITICAL PARTY TO START

List of JUDGES and Politicians Charged with TREASON

Commonwealth of Australia Constitution
Act

 

BUY GOLD BEFORE ITS TOO LATE

INDEX
Home page

chemtrail-flyer for
monthly meetings

Rally Calendar

FEMA trying to control Australia

Global warming Hoax

NWO OVERLORDS WILL REDUCE POPULATIONS

The Ruling Elete 'RE'

NWO 100 year summary

COURT ACTION AGAINST W.H.O for mass Murder

SWINE FLU VIRUS PATENTED

COLLOIDAL SILVER WILL DESTROY THE VIRUS

updated 2-11-09 7-2-10 3-4-10

Getting Ready for the UN Takeover
"NWO PLANS UNCOVERED "

UN NWO instructed our Government to, go outside our Constitution, enact changes to allow their International NWO UN Laws to be introduced and Treaties/Declarations to be implemented which could only be done when our Australian Constitution terms removed the Queen, and ' clauses concerning the 'OATH OF ALLEGIENCE' were changed without any referendum.'.

Australian PRIME-MINISTER JULIA GILLARD when she was Deputy Prime Minister was CHARGED WITH TREASON in 2007 and these charges have been concealed by the MEDIA and this criminal offence will go before a GRAND JURY soon for an Indictment.
and others (Judges- Police- Magistrates- Public Servants, Media and Reporters, who have concealed this action, are also charged with Treason.
AND more Media management will be also charged with Misprision of Treason for concealing this criminal offence against the Australian Nation and can be sentenced to 10 years Jail,


People don't realise; For any public servant To conceal, hide, or aid the crime of TREASON is to be guilty of Misprision of Treason with is the same offence. And these persons cannot hold any public office whilst under the charge of Treason ir Misprision of Treason.

 

NWO plans uncovered; The NWO are the World Banking Cartel who own all 'Reserve Banks" - They control the world economy, they have the 'rights' to print the money for all Countries under the UN, and consequently they make trillions of dollars in 'Fractional Reserve Lending' and they dictate the price of Gold making huge profits from the 'highs' and 'lows' -

Yet they PAY NO TAXES, and own their own FREE SOVEREIGN STATES in England and USA with diplomatic immunity, at "The Crown London" and Washington" and the third in their circle of NWO is the 'Vatican Sovereign State' They reap in trillions of dollars interest daily from all UN member Country's Government DEBTS and are forcefully promoting more increased debts before wiping each Government's control of the country out.

To gain control over each Government, THE NWO BANKER'S favorite MO is to provide 'Bail-Out' funds to their member corp's and to offer 'Stimulus-Packages' all of which will never be repaid. Governments are 'CONNED' to sell off their public owned assets such as transport, shipping, water, Rail etc as the NWO UN take over can then take full control of these corporations without the need to gain public referenda approval. UNIONS ARE UP IN ARMS ABOUT THESE FRAUDULENT SALES.

Governments are coerced into taking more loan money to use as 'stimulus packages' to improve the economy so as to get governments into huge debts they will have no chance of repaying, preparing the way for the NWO to come in and take over all assets. What's more the AGENDA 21 urges Gov's to sell off their assets such as Railways, Transport, Shipping, Insurance, Water, Power, Banking, on the pretext that it will help reduce the huge debts. This is farcical and the real reason is for NWO UN takeovers, to gain easier control over private corporations than they would have if the public remained the owners of utilities. So it is to their advantage to get the Government of the day to off load them before the NWO takeover.. This shows how 'gullible' our politicians in Government are to get duped by the NWO rhetoric. We have been sold out since 1975 by all Leaders and every Government. - We have only ONE chance to stop it! keep pestering your 'Member' with these facts, and sever the UN Treaties.

Under TREATIES

The U.N. Charter, US Congress has established the Charter as the Supreme Law of the land (Fugi v. State of California, 1950-52). and All Global Member States of the UN including Australia have (Illegally) sworn an allegiance to this UN Foreign power, and to get any STATE to do this- The UN Instructed the RUDD Australian Federal Government to 'Suspend the Constitution' avoiding the need for a referendum.

If you regard this as the most serious threat to Australian way of life and our freedom - Join the new party- Australian Sovereignty Party - Urgently.

Following are just some of the policies of the United Nations:

Control of all zoning/States matters in all Member States and the control of our National parks, Rivers and Historical sites, Barrier Reef etc.
Control over whether women are allowed to have babies.
Control over population
Control over all food sources.
Control over our Farms.
Control over all Land and Property
Control over the economic and judicial policies of all nations (Member States inc Australia).
Programs are being processed to create a tax on citizens of all Member States as a permanent method of UN funding. The Fraudulent 'Carbon Tax' is designed to fund the WHO, UN NWO Security forces.
The United Nation has its own Army and United States soldiers and Military from all Member States must swear allegiance to this foreign government.

AND THEY WILL ABOLISH PRIVATE LAND OWNERSHIP AND

ABOLISH ALL SEPERATE STATES RULING FROM ONE CORPORATION OUT OF ACT.

MEMBER STATES have been set up to roll over into UN Control, so far these STATES are bankrupt, and the IMF will take over Governance and initiate the IMF Banking Cartel's policies.;- Argentina, Spain, Italy, Portugal, Greece, more soon to follow, and Australia next.

Below is an action by a very brave loyal Australian to charge our Politicians , Media, Police, and Judicial with CRIMINAL TREASONABLE OFFENCES.

List of JUDGES and Politicians Charged with TREASON

 

 

 

 

Page 1 of 11
Date: 31st March 2009
From: Brian Shaw
Po Box 800 Werribee Victoria 3030


To: All Councilors Wyndham/Werribee
State of Victoria
Electorate of Julia Gillard
Federal Member, Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia
Currently the Deputy Prime Minister of the Commonwealth
The Current Councillors
1. Cr Shane Bourke (Mayor)
2. Cr Heather Marcus (Deputy Mayor)
3. Cr Marie Brittan
4. Cr Mark Rose
5. Cr Cynthia Manson
6. Cr John Menegazzo
7. Cr Bob Fairclough
8. Cr Glenn Goodfellow
9. Cr Kim McAliney


Subject Matter:
The Grand Jury process that has been activated by private prosecution right against
Julia Gillard and others involving an organized attack on the Constitution of the
Commonwealth and other State Constitutions to impose a United Nations Agenda
upon all Australians


Page 2 of 11
Grand Jury Process:
The legal right to go before a Grand Jury in the State of Victoria exists at section 354
of the Victorian Crimes Act 1958. To activate the right by private prosecution Julia
Gillard was charged with a Common Law offence of Concealing Treason. The charge
was filed in the Melbourne Magistrates Court during December of 2007 and served
15th January 2008 at the Synnott Street Werribee Electoral Office, returnable to
Melbourne Magistrates Court on 29th January 2009
The Others:
On the 29th January 2009 there were other defendants also charged, in addition to
28 other defendants charged heard 15th December 2006, all relating to the same
offence


The Problem:
Since 1984 there has been an organized concerted attack on all Constitutions in the
Commonwealth of Australia purportedly to achieve a Republic, but, in reality to trap
every Australian into a United Nations agenda without their knowledge nor consent
Fee Simple Titles Queensland:
In the State of Queensland a Corporation has been set up to purportedly gather all
Fee Simple Titles into this particular Corporation called “The Brigalow Corporation”.
To effect this certain laws have been altered or amended in Queensland to achieve
this objective
The United Nations Purpose:
“The United Nations has given Federal Government a Mandate of ownership for
housing, farms, property and business to Government Control, once the Republic
has been proclaimed”.
Page 3 of 11
In Victoria
With total disregard to the Commonwealth Referendum result held during 1999, the
Victorian Parliament introduced a Bill titled “Courts and Tribunals Legislation
(Further Amendment) Bill” on 24th May 2000.
The purpose of the Bill was to abolish “The oath of Allegiance” from the Legal
Practice Act 1996
R. Hulls (Attorney General Victoria)
The Bill was introduced into the Victorian Parliament by Mr R Hulls; the Attorney
General for the State of Victoria, the Bill did become an Act without any referendum
in full breach of the 1999 Commonwealth referendum result
Western Australia
On 1st January 2004 the Attorney General of Western Australia Mr J McGinty in
agreement with the then Governor Mr Sanderson enacted an Act titled “Acts
Amendment and Repeal Courts and Legal Practice Act 2003 (WA)”.
The purpose of the Bill/Act was to remove the Crown and Her Majesty Queen
Elizabeth ll Her Heirs and Successors and Subjects from specific law within Western
Australia in full breach of the 1999 Commonwealth referendum result
The Bill/Act did not have any referendum authorizing this legislation
All Attorney Generals
In the period 15th December 2006 and 29th January 2007 when Julia Gillard was
charged all current Attorney Generals operating within the Commonwealth of
Australia were also charged by private prosecution after which the legal right to the
Grand Jury process was also activated in relation to each Attorney General
Damian Bugg (Commonwealth Public Prosecutions)
The Director of Public Prosecutions Mr Damian Bugg was also charged with the other
defendants, but, Mr Bugg sent an office delegate to the Court to have his criminal
charge dismissed with the other named defendants


Page 4 of 11
The Retaliation
Because criminal charges for serious indictable offences were filed against
“Government Officials”, two Attorney Generals filed civil actions against myself to
have their Courts declare “vexatious litigation” in an attempt to conceal the Grand
Jury process activated in criminal jurisdiction against themselves
McGinty / Bugg (Co-joined)
The civil suit in Western Australia was originated by Mr J McGinty the then Attorney
General for the State of Western Australia co-joined by Mr Damian Bugg the Director
of Public Prosecutions Commonwealth
The Matter (WA)
The civil writ was originally heard by Commissioner Braddock (CIV 2264/2004), on
appeal by Justice McKechnie (CIV 1128/2005), on appeal (Full Court) by Justices
Styler, Buss and Christine Wheeler (CACV 83/2005)


The Arrest
At the appeal (Full Court) the three Supreme Court Judges, Styler, Buss and Christine
Wheeler were informed from the bar table that the removal of both the Crown and
Monarch from the Supreme Court Act (WA) was an act of Treason and as such the
three Judges were primary offenders, accordingly were placed under arrest from the
bar table and formally charged for such offence in the Melbourne Magistrates Court,
now pending Grand Jury process
(The formal Charge handed up on the day is attached)
Corryn Rayner (Supreme Court Registrar)
Costs have been incurred in Western Australia involving this civil writ instigated by
McGinty/Bugg against myself, Corryn Rayner was the registrar who heard the taxing
issue relating to the Supreme Court costs. Corryn Rayner was murdered by
person/persons unknown and her body buried in Kings Park overlooking Perth
Western Australia


Page 5 of 11
R Hulls (Attorney General Victoria)
To halt and delay the criminal process activated against specific “Government
Officials” R Hulls, the Victorian Attorney General also issued a civil writ against
myself to get “His Courts” to declare Brian Shaw a vexatious litigant in the State of
Victoria
His Courts
I say “His Courts” because it was Mr Hulls that introduced the Bill (now Act) titled
“Courts and Tribunals Legislation (Further Amendment) Act” into the Victorian
Parliament removing the Oath of Allegiance without referendum approval in breach
of the 1999 referendum result
The Order
The order sought by Mr Hulls was given by Justice Hansen stating:
“Mr Shaw can only file further process by leave of a Court presided over by
an Australian Lawyer”
Australian Lawyer
For any person to sit in any Court within the State of Victoria under the auspices of
“An Australian Lawyer” is to agree with the “Oath of Allegiance” being removed
from the Legal Practice Act in Victoria, Legislation introduced by Mr Hulls himself
The Appeal
The appeal of the Hulls writ was heard by Justice Dodds Streeton and Nettle. Both
were challenged for bias and after consideration continued the appeal hearing and
upheld the decision of Hansen given in the civil judgment


Page 6 of 11
Dodds Streeton (A Defendant Judge)
The challenge of bias concerning Justice Dodds Streeton emanated from the National
Bank writ issued against the Walter Family. During the hearing of the Walter matter
Dodds Streeton did admit having a financial interest with the National Bank.
When asked by Carmen Walter to stand down Dodds Streeton declined, heard the
matter resulting in the loss of $4.000.000, (Four Million Dollars) worth of Real Estate
at Wodonga Victoria
Dodds Streeton was formally charged by Carmen Walter and a Grand Jury
Application was also lodged with the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Victoria
Dodds Streeton and Nettle
A number of people have lodged “criminal process” at the Full Court of the Supreme
Court of Victoria for Grand Jury hearing after witnessing the conduct and
concealment of serious indictable offences by Justices Dodds Streeton and Nettle
Civil or Criminal Jurisdiction
The fundamental and basic principal of law activates that whenever and wherever
indictable offences are discovered in any civil matter, the “criminal matter takes
priority” over the civil
The Criminal Charges
The criminal charges lodged by myself and others involving and discovering serious
indictable offences ranging from treason to Judges hearing their own matters have
not been withdrawn and remain pending Grand Jury process
Local Government
If the “United Nations agenda” as revealed by Beasley’s statement is to function
within Australia, then Local Government must submit and agree to the United
Nations agenda, which is the purpose of informing yourselves (Local Government)
via this information. The three tiers of Government are Local, State and Federal


Page 7 of 11
Grand Jury
The only competent and legal jurisdiction to hear the twin offences of Treason and
or Misprision of Treason (Concealment of) is a sitting Grand Jury (23 Electors) this is
stated law
“It is provided now that all the prosecutions shall be by presentment, but
preserving the prerogative of the Crown through the Attorney General to
proceed by information, except in case of ‘treason’ which has to be by
indictment. Now indictment means by Grand Jury and therefore, inasmuch
as the statute provides that Treason shall be tried by indictment only. That
means that it must be by Grand Jury and no other means is provided for
bringing it before a Grand Jury.” The finding of the Attorney General is
equivalent to the finds of the Grand Jury, but in the case of Treason it must
be the finding of the Grand Jury.”
[Byrne v Armstrong (1899) 25 VLR 126 at 132]


The Application
Any application applying for a Grand Jury hearing in the State of Victoria under
section 354 of the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) must be heard by the “Full Court” (Not
Appeal Court) of the Supreme Court of Victoria sitting in criminal jurisdiction
The sitting Judges hearing the application against the named defendants are “limited
to hearing the charge only”. They are unable to enter into the evidence of the
matter, such jurisdiction is the exclusive jurisdiction of a sitting Grand Jury
“The Section (354) does not place upon the Full Court the task of examining
the evidence. Nor of determining whether the prosecutor has established a
true bill. The section bearing the interpretation, which was placed upon it
many years ago, which has never been questioned by Parliament, gives the
Full Court a limited role which is no more than we have described. It
requires no more than an affidavit complying with the section, disclosing an
indictable offence.”
Lorne Campbell 1986 (BC8600228)


Page 8 of 11
The Perverting Process (Freemasonry)
In the year 2001 Carmen Walter and myself (the plaintiffs) attempted to issue a “civil
writ” against “Freemasonry Victoria”, the writ was refused by the Supreme Court
Prothonotary under verbal instruction of Justice Beach. Following the refusal of the
“civil writ” an application was lodged with the Full Court of the Supreme Court
Victoria
The Actual Hearing
The events surrounding the actual hearing will be correctly placed into a separate
affidavit but, I will state in the correspondence to yourselves that the only intent of
the Full Court of the Supreme Court (Five Judges) was to have the Byrne Armstrong
judgment overturned because it stated:
“That where the affidavit reveals an indictable offence the Court has no
discretionary power but to order the sheriff to form the Grand Jury”
Respect for the Constitution
Clearly there is now no respect for the Constitution of the Commonwealth or States,
rather the Constitutions have now been overlaid by a massive corporation structure,
inclusive of the Supreme Courts and High Court
Your Responsibility
You have now been formally informed of serious indictable offences, you can choose
to do nothing or you can choose to do something, the first thing that you should do
is gather all relevant or actual facts
My Responsibility
If you wish to be fully informed of the relevant facts inclusive of your legal
responsibility I will make myself available to answer any of your questions
Page 9 of 11
The Alternative
The alternative is to be summoned to a Grand Jury hearing and be placed into the
witness box and be asked:
“What did you do after receiving the correspondence revealing Treason and
the Concealment of Treason?”
Werribee Background
In 1882 my Grand Father’s oldest Brother was accidently killed on the East Bank of
the Werribee River when he was only six years of age.
My Grand Father (Bill Shaw) farmed all of his life at Werribee and Little River during
which time he served for a large number of years as a Councillor for the Shire
inclusive of a few terms as Mayor.
From time to time he would pick us up from school in Werribee and look after us
during Council meetings before going to his home at Little River
Legal Advice
If you wish to seek legal advice please advise the law firm giving the advise in writing
that the “Oath of Allegiance” has been removed from the “Legal Practice Act” in
Victoria by Legislation introduced into Victoria by Mr R Hulls, the current Attorney
General for the State of Victoria during May 2000
Competent Jurisdiction
The only competent jurisdiction to hear and determine the evidence in relation to
the twin offences of Treason and the Concealment of Treason is a Grand Jury.
An indictment for such offences can only be obtained from a Grand Jury
Page 10 of 11
The Sheriff and the Queen
The Words of the Application Order
“The Sheriff is ordered to summons a Grand Jury to appear at a Court to be holden
at a time and place determined by the Court in accordance with the provision of
section 354 of the Crimes Act 1958 (VIC) to attend at such Court at that time and
place to inquire present do and execute all things which on the part of the Queen
shall then and there be commanded of them.”
Freemasonry
A short video enactment of a Masonic Oath / Obligation is attached with this
information
The attached DVD reveals the manner and form required to take the
Oath/Obligation, it also reveals that the candidate swears to conceal and never
reveal, it also reveals the penalty agreed to by the candidate
Crimes Act 1958 Victoria
s.316 Unlawful oaths to commit treason, murder etc.
(2) Every person who—
(a) administers or is present at and consents to the administering of any
oath or engagement in the nature of an oath purporting to bind the
person who takes it to act in any of the ways following (that is to say):—
(vii) not to reveal or discover any unlawful association society or
confederacy or any illegal act done or to be done or any illegal oath
or engagement that may have been administered or tendered to or
taken by himself or any other person or the import of any such oath
or engagement; or
shall be guilty of an indictable offence, and shall be liable to level 6
imprisonment (5 years maximum).
The Attachments with this information are:
1. A 9 minute DVD of a Masonic Oath/Obligation (Master Mason)


Page 11 of 11
2. A DVD titled, “What the Government Does not want you to Know”
3. A bound document titled: “What the Government Does not want you to Know”
(companion to the DVD)
4. Copy of Charge and Summons relating to Julia Gillard
5. Affidavit of Service
6. Section 44 Commonwealth Constitution
7. Case Law defining Treason
8. Crimes Act 1958 section 354 (Grand Jury)
9. Beasley’s United Nations intention
10. Inner Growth area authority revealing a $95.000 hectare tax
11. Grand Jury Application Julia Gillard
12. Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) The Security of the Commonwealth
Section 80.1 (Treason)
13. Formal Notice and Charge handed up at the Western Australia Supreme Court
(Court of Appeal) April 2005
14. Courts and Tribunals Legislation (Further Amendment Act 2000)
(Removing the Oath of Allegiance from the Legal Practice Act 1996)
15. Acts Amendment and Repeal Courts and Legal Practice Act 2003 WA
(Part 8 Amendments about the Crown)
16. Herald Sun Article dated 23rd October 2008 titled: “My Oath They’re Angry”
17. West Australian Article dated 28th March 2009 titled “Brown Plans Overhaul of Royalty
Rules”
Respectfully __________
Brian Shaw Box 800 Werribee 3030 Vic

SUMMARY

What is most disturbing by a handfull of LAWYERS JUDGES, AND MAGISTRATES AND POLITICIANS is the fact that they are FIRSTLY AUSTRALIANS.

How dare they take such secret covert and treasonable actions when they should be firstly;

Protecting their OWN families, Their own constituents, Their own fellow Australians, and their own Country. The ANZACS fought and died for their FREEDOM and fought for our Country to be in our own hands to prosper, NOT TO BE in allien UN NWO Bankers selfish hands, particularly as they are trying to be the 'SELF APPOINTED RULERS' of the Earth directing our Government to anslave us with draconian laws.

NOTICE To all AUSTRALIANS;

STAND UP AND SHOW THESE UN NWO PEOPLE TO GET OUT OF OUR COUNTRY. and to all Politicians; You were elected to protect OUR RIGHTS, "How dare you change your allegience once we have placed our trust in you".

It is shameful and dispicable that we have Australian Politicians and Government employees who would sell out our people, and tell such LIES using the MEDIA who are also partners in this act of Treason to hide those responsible.

ABOUT OUR AUSTRALIA'S CONSTITUTION AND LAWS:

Hi Chris from James Dean- Article revamped by Chris.

The whole point of a democracy is that the people are in control of the Common-wealth which they own collectively. In this case, this is the Commonwealth of Australia.

We, the People, do not vote our political representatives into power because we, the People, always have the power. Our political representatives are voted into positions of responsibility to maintain the laws which we, the People, vote on via referendum as part of the enactment process. For decades politicians have hoodwinked the People into believing they and only they have the power to enact laws using a governor general which they choose.

The highest man-made law in Australia is the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 and it is by this Constitution under section 51 that allows our political representatives to make laws "subject to the Constitution" and this includes the process outlined in section 128 if these political laws are subject to the Constitution.

If our greatest man-made law in Australia (the Constitution) cannot be enacted or amended without a vote of the people then because all laws are subject to the Common-wealth Constitution, all laws must be passed in the same way and that is by the people.

The constitution is binding on all Judges, courts and people of every State, notwithstanding anything in the laws of any State so no high court can usurp the authority of the referendum of the people of Australia and in 1988 the people of every State once again reiterated their wish not to recognise LOCAL GOVERNMENT's and so therefore LOCAL GOVERNMENT's are invalid under section 109 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 regardless of the State LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1995 which automatically became invalid the day it was supposedly enacted.


Inconsistency of Laws

"When a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid."> - COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT - SECT 109

The people decided in 1988 not to recognise LOCAL GOVERNMENT in their Commonwealth Constitution referendum, so the only reason for their existence is to support State Governments for the shortfall funding each year via the Federal consolidated funds.

The question put at the referendum was, "The Constitution recognises Government at Federal and State levels, but makes no mention of local government. Constitution Alteration (Local Government) 1988 proposed to alter the constitution so as to recognise local government."
Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_referendum,_1988_(Local_Government)

The proposal was refuted by the people at the 1988 referendum.


Improper Collection and Use Of Local Council Rates

Due to a range of UN treaties and agreements, hard working Australians have their taxes sent overseas in foreign aid, to the known tune of $4.5 billion dollars, by the Commonwealth government without even being asked permission to do so by their representative parliamentarians and, at the same time, are taxed again by unconstitutional taxes in the form of Local Council 'RATES' on freehold land which was originally purchased from the Commonwealth pool of land and became "alienated land" recognised under the LAND ADMINISTRATION ACT 1997.


It is interesting that the LAND ADMINISTRATION ACT 1997 also became unconstitutional under the Commonwealth Constitution because it offends section 51.2 or (ii) which states,

" (ii) taxation; but so as not to discriminate between States or parts of States;"

and by giving the State Minister the right to Tax freehold land and section 81 which says;

"COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT - SECT 81

Consolidated Revenue Fund

All revenues or moneys raised or received by the Executive Government of the Commonwealth shall form one Consolidated Revenue Fund, to be appropriated for the purposes of the Commonwealth in the manner and subject to the charges and liabilities imposed by this Constitution."

The above section says that there shall be one consolidated fund for the purposes of the Commonwealth. Where does it say we give $4.5 billion dollars in foreign Aid and at the same time borrow billions from the IMF at bloated interest rates? We the people did not say this in our Commonwealth Constitution.

Clause 5 of the Constitution reads as follows:

"COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT - CLAUSE 5 Operation of the Constitution and laws [see Note 3]


This Act, and all laws made by the Parliament of the Commonwealth under the Constitution, shall be binding on the courts, judges, and people of every State and of every part of the Commonwealth, notwithstanding anything in the laws of any State; and the laws of the Commonwealth shall be in force on all British ships, the Queen's ships of war excepted, whose first port of clearance and whose port of destination are in the Commonwealth."

Under section 106 all State Constitutions come under the Commonwealth Constitution.

"COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT - SECT 106

Saving of Constitutions
The Constitution of each State of the Commonwealth shall, subject to this Constitution, continue as at the establishment of the Commonwealth, or as at the admission or establishment of the State, as the case may be, until altered in accordance with the Constitution of the State."

So if each State Constitution is "subject to the Commonwealth Constitution" and the Commonwealth Constitution does not recognise LOCAL GOVERNMENT then no State Constitution can continue to or recognise LOCAL GOVERNMENT.

On 1st January 2004 the Attorney General of Western Australia Mr. J McGinty in agreement with the then Governor Mr. Sanderson enacted an Act titled "Acts Amendment and Repeal Courts and Legal Practice Act 2003 (WA)".

The purpose of the Bill/Act was to remove the Crown and Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth ll Her Heirs and Successors and Subjects from specific law within Western Australia. This was in full breach of the 1999 Commonwealth referendum result. Therefore, as this Bill/Act did not go to any referendum authorizing this legislation - it is invalid legislation.

"CONSTITUTION ACT 1889 - SECT 2

2 . Legislature to be constituted in Western Australia

(1) There shall be, in place of the Legislative Council now subsisting, a Legislative Council and a Legislative Assembly: and it shall be lawful for Her Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the said Council and Assembly, to make laws for the peace, order, and good Government of the Colony of Western Australia and its Dependencies: and such Council and Assembly shall, subject to the provisions of this Act, have all the powers and functions of the now subsisting Legislative Council.

(2) The Parliament of Western Australia consists of the Queen and the Legislative Council and the Legislative Assembly.

(3) Every Bill, after its passage through the Legislative Council and the Legislative Assembly, shall, subject to section 73, be presented to the Governor for assent by or in the name of the Queen and shall be of no effect unless it has been duly assented to by or in the name of the Queen.


CONSTITUTION ACT 1889 - SECT 73


73 . Legislature as constituted by this Act empowered to alter any of its provisions

(1) Subject to the succeeding provisions of this section, the Legislature of the Colony shall have full power and authority, from time to time, by any Act, to repeal or alter any of the provisions of this Act. Provided always, that it shall not be lawful to present to the Governor for Her Majesty’s assent any Bill by which any change in the Constitution of the Legislative Council or of the Legislative Assembly shall be effected, unless the second and third readings of such Bill shall have been passed with the concurrence of an absolute majority of the whole number of the members for the time being of the Legislative Council and the Legislative Assembly respectively. Provided also, that every Bill which shall be so passed for the election of a Legislative Council at any date earlier than by Part III provided, and every Bill which shall interfere with the operation of sections 69, 70, 71, or 72, or of Schedules B, C, or D, or of this section, shall be reserved by the Governor for the signification of Her Majesty's pleasure thereon 10, 11 .

(2) A Bill that —

(a) expressly or impliedly provides for the abolition of or alteration in the office of Governor; or

(b) expressly or impliedly provides for the abolition of the Legislative Council or of the Legislative Assembly; or

(c) expressly or impliedly provides that the Legislative Council or the Legislative Assembly shall be composed of members other than members chosen directly by the people; or

(d) expressly or impliedly provides for a reduction in the numbers of the members of the Legislative Council or of the Legislative Assembly; or

(e) expressly or impliedly in any way affects any of the following sections of this Act, namely sections 2, 3, 4, 50, 51 and 73,

shall not be presented for assent by or in the name of the Queen unless

(f) the second and third readings of the Bill shall have been passed with the concurrence of an absolute majority of the whole number of the members for the time being of the Legislative Council and the Legislative Assembly, respectively; and

(g) the Bill has also prior to such presentation been approved by the electors in accordance with this section,

and a Bill assented to consequent upon its presentation in contravention of this subsection shall be of no effect as an Act.

(3) On a day fixed by the Governor by Order in Council, being a day not sooner than 2 months, and not later than 6 months, after the passage through the Legislative Council and the Legislative Assembly of a Bill of a kind referred to in subsection (2), the question for the approval or otherwise of the Bill shall be submitted to the electors qualified to vote for the election of members of the Legislative Assembly according to the provisions of the Electoral Act 1907 .

(4) When the Bill is submitted to the electors the vote shall be taken in such manner as is fixed by law.

(5) If a majority of the electors voting approve the Bill, it shall be presented to the Governor for assent by or in the name of the Queen.

(6) Any person entitled to vote at a general election of members of the Legislative Assembly is entitled to bring proceedings in the Supreme Court for a declaration, injunction or other remedy to enforce the provisions of this section either before or after a Bill of a kind referred to in subsection (2) is presented for assent by or in the name of the Queen."


Jim McGinty is way out on a treasonous limb by removing the Queen who wears the peoples Crown of authority from the West Australian Government. As a matter of interest the Crown was taken from the despotic King John in the year 1215 at the signing of the Magna Charta.


Dennis McLeod is making millions of dollars out of local councils who are unconstitutionally controlled by the equally unconstitutional LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1995.

It is interesting to note that both Constitutionally recognised State and Federal Governments use the independent DPP to prosecute their cases while unconstitutional LOCAL GOVERNMENT's use private lawyers with financial vested interests to commence litigation.

Neither private lawyers nor LOCAL GOVERNMENT's are recognised as being authorised authorities to bring criminal charges under the Criminal Procedure Act 2004 section 20 & 80.2 a - e. LOCAL GOVERNMENT needs an authorization from the Governor of Western Australia before it can commence any criminal offense.

LOCAL GOVERNMENT is recognized as a private person, a body corporate capable of being sued and suing which falls in the category of only civil actions, not criminal and therefore cannot prosecute without written authorization from the West Australian Governor.

State and Federal Governments use the independent DPP, so if LOCAL GOVERNMENT is constitutionally recognised like State and Federal Government's are they would use the DPP and would not need the authorization of the WA Governor.

There is a lot more to this matter than a few cleaver words from either McGinty or McLeod (and who Mr Winderstorm is, I have no idea) but he sound like another one banging the drum of antidemocratic process.

 

These 4 film reports below are a must to view, make copies before they are taken off the net by the NWO
PART 1

 

PART 2

 
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/HSNxzuz1jR8&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/HSNxzuz1jR8&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

PART 3

 

PART 4

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Cg9OXVmcU6E&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Cg9OXVmcU6E&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object

_________________________

 

HOW THEY CHANGED THE QLD CONSTITUTION WITHOUT ASKING THE PEOPLE, WITHOUT A REFERENDUM.

13 Amendment of Constitution Act of Queensland
(1) The Constitution Act 1867-1978 of the State of Queensland is in
this section referred to as the Principal Act.
(2) Section 11A of the Principal Act is amended in subsection (3):
(a) by omitting from paragraph (a):
(i) "and Signet"; and
(ii) "constituted under Letters Patent under the Great Seal of
the United Kingdom"; and
(b) by omitting from paragraph (b):
(i) "and Signet"; and
(ii) "whenever and so long as the office of Governor is
vacant or the Governor is incapable of discharging the
duties of administration or has departed from
Queensland".
(3) Section 11B of the Principal Act is amended:
(a) by omitting "Governor to conform to instructions" and
substituting "Definition of Royal Sign Manual";
(b) by omitting subsection (1); and
(c) by omitting from subsection (2):
(i) "(2)";
(ii) "this section and in"; and
(iii) "and the expression 'Signet' means the seal commonly
used for the sign manual of the Sovereign or the seal
with which documents are sealed by the Secretary of
State in the United Kingdom on behalf of the
Sovereign".

==============================================================

Tens of millions people now realise the NWO will 'CRASH THE ECONOMY"

Reports show 57 million Americans are reported receiving food assistance; The financial crisis is so bad that nearly all American cities and States and their Federal Government are nearing default as their US Federal Reserve private banking system has been forced to buy over 80% of their own debt; ALL BUT three OF THE USA STATES ARE BANKRUPT - An unbelievable toll of their citizens losing their funds - over 2.4 million of them were forced into bankruptcy ; Pension crisis of such unprecedented magnitude millions will soon be in absolute poverty.Throughout the world; Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain, Argentina are already bankrupt and Australia is next. In Argentina; 14 million people lost all their savings, 'supa' bonds etc whilst banks were closed down, Bank accounts were blocked. 5000 children died of starvation. Millions left destitute over night. The same IMF and NWO BANKERS who sent Argentina bankrupt, are ready to jump in and control our economy and to collect ETS Fraudulent money to fund their NWO Security and Military.

They are buying GOLD whilst their currency still has some purchasing value - THE NWO will devalue the currency very soon, bring in their FOUR WORLD UNIONS all with a new currency. If Governments fail to escape their "TREATY MEMBERSHIP' and reject their NWO, WHO, UN WTO NATO FT, control they will fall to be completely under their total control, thus causing each's, own Country to be destroyed, and all peoples to lose their homes and property and freedom. Public now realise they need to buy Gold/Silver with their cash before the cash is devalued.

The NWO international crime syndicate, Banjing cartel work through the 'Reputable Organisations' fronts - such as UN, NATO, WHO, WTO, FT, CFR, as the FRONT to enforce their policies and AGENDA 21. All major personnel are appointed by these NWO Banking Cartel, and any person who blows the whistle on them is eliminated, by murder with mystery forged suicide notes.

Planes are shot out of the sky with any political dissenter, then Military and FBI CIA take total control of the crash site stopping anyone snooping around to collect evidence then issuing a false media report to keep the public from knowing the truth.

AGENDA 21 directs the affairs of all Governments UNDER UN MEMBERSHIP, making sure they place 'BLACK-OUTS' on what is considered safe for MEDIA release under their new 'TERRORISM NATIONAL SECURITY LAWS' this enables them to create any illegal, treacherous deed to go undetected by the public. See the 'End Game'

 

   

 

123 • 4 • 5 -Free Counter
Free Counter
<< PreviousNext >>