Alaska Water Quality at a Glance
Last updated: January 12, 2026
PFAS is the watch item
Is Alaska Water Safe to Drink?
Often yes, and source quality can be excellent — Many Alaskan systems draw from clean lakes, rivers, and aquifers, including Anchorage’s Eklutna Lake source3. The main statewide “watch item” is PFAS (“forever chemicals”) near some airports and military facilities linked to historic firefighting foam use2. EPA finalized enforceable PFAS drinking water limits in 2024, including 4 parts per trillion for PFOA and PFOS, with phased monitoring and compliance timelines (and possible schedule adjustments over time)1. Rural access remains uneven in parts of the state4.
❄️ Key Facts for Alaska Residents
- EPA’s PFAS limits are extremely low: PFOA/PFOS are set at 4 ppt under the 2024 federal rule — meaning even tiny amounts now matter1.
- Some high PFAS readings come from site sampling (not tap): Gustavus research reported very high concentrations in specific site samples — historical sampling (not current tap water)5.
- PFAS can show up in remote regions: Research has detected PFAS in Arctic snow/precipitation in the broader region, which is part of the “background context” for the Arctic environment6.
- Utilities still monitor the “usuals” too: Systems track regulated contaminants and report results in annual CCRs (for example, Anchorage AWWU publishes water quality reports)3.
- Access varies by community: Alaska DEC notes that thousands of rural households still lack in-home water service in some areas4.
Read the full report below for detailed analysis, regional data, and actionable recommendations for Alaska residents.
Alaska — The Last Frontier — Water Quality Report 2026: PFAS Testing, Infrastructure & Safety
Last updated: January 12, 2026
Alaska’s public water systems range from large urban utilities to small rural systems. Many draw from clean lakes, rivers, or aquifers. Anchorage’s main source is Eklutna Lake, a high-quality mountain reservoir3. The biggest statewide watch item is PFAS associated with historic firefighting foam use at some airports and military facilities2. EPA finalized enforceable PFAS drinking water limits in 2024 (including 4 ppt for PFOA/PFOS), with phased monitoring and compliance timelines1. Rural access remains uneven, with some homes lacking in-home water service in parts of the state4. Infrastructure investments continue as Alaska improves systems under challenging Arctic conditions7.

Alaska Water Quality: Current Status (2024–2026)
Statewide compliance and testing
- Most systems meet federal standards: Utilities monitor regulated contaminants and publish annual Consumer Confidence Reports (CCRs). Anchorage AWWU posts reports online as an example of a large urban system’s reporting3.
- PFAS is the key emerging issue: Risk is most associated with certain airport and military sites due to historic AFFF use2. EPA’s 2024 rule sets enforceable limits (including 4 ppt for PFOA/PFOS)1.
- Rural access varies: Some homes still rely on hauled water or lack in-home service; programs continue working to expand safe water and sanitation in unserved areas4.
Urban vs. rural differences
- Urban systems (like Anchorage) can have strong source water and stable operations, supported by regular reporting and monitoring3.
- Remote communities face harsh weather, high costs, and staffing challenges to run systems year-round, which can make upgrades slower and more expensive4.
- Infrastructure stress: Alaska’s report card highlights the scale, climate, and logistics challenges that influence water reliability and maintenance needs statewide7.
PFAS response (what typically happens)
- Where found: PFAS concerns are most often associated with specific sites (airports/military) rather than statewide tap water uniformly2.
- Practical steps: When PFAS is detected above action thresholds, responses can include targeted sampling, alternate water provisions, and treatment planning where needed2.
- Regulatory context: EPA’s 2024 rule establishes enforceable PFAS requirements for public systems over a phased timeline1.
Looking forward: 2026–2030
Alaska continues investing in reliable drinking water across a huge, harsh landscape. For households, the simplest rule is: your utility CCR is the best snapshot for your neighborhood, and a certified at-home filter can be a reasonable extra layer if you live near a known PFAS area or want added peace of mind.
Recommendations for Alaska Residents

Check Your Local Report
Start with your utility’s Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) for the latest numbers. Anchorage AWWU provides current CCRs online as a model for what to look for3. If you use a private well near a known site, consider PFAS testing through an approved lab.

Support Rural Upgrades
In some communities, safe in-home water is still not universal. Alaska DEC programs track needs and progress; staying informed locally helps keep projects moving4.

Consider Certified Filtration
If you live near a known PFAS site or you simply want extra protection, look for NSF-certified carbon or reverse osmosis (RO) options that are tested for PFAS reduction. View our recommended Waterdrop RO option. We may earn a commission if you buy through our links. This never affects the information we present.

Report Water Concerns
For taste, odor, or color issues, contact your local utility. For PFAS site background and program updates, Alaska DOT&PF provides statewide airport PFAS information and community resources2.

Prepare for Extreme Cold
Insulate and protect lines where needed. During severe cold snaps, some homes run water briefly to reduce freezing risk. Keep emergency water on hand in case of outages.
Alaska Cities We Cover
Anchorage Water Quality
Anchorage Water & Wastewater Utility draws mainly from Eklutna Lake and publishes CCRs each year. Use the latest CCR for your system’s reported results and treatment notes3.
What This Means
Alaska’s tap water often meets legal standards and can come from very high-quality sources. The biggest “watch item” is PFAS near some historic firefighting-foam sites (often airports or military facilities). EPA’s 2024 rule sets enforceable PFAS limits (including 4 ppt for PFOA/PFOS)1. If you live near a known site or want extra peace of mind, a certified home filter can be a reasonable added layer.
We aim to stay current, but figures can change — always check the latest official reports for your address.
Sources & Notes
- EPA — Final PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation (2024; includes enforceable limits such as PFOA/PFOS at 4 ppt). Rule overview (PDF)
- Alaska DOT&PF — Airport water / PFAS program information and community response resources. Program page
- Anchorage Water & Wastewater Utility — Drinking water quality information and annual reports/CCRs. Water Quality | CCR reports
- Alaska DEC — Water & Sewer Challenge (rural access and service gaps). Program page
- Gustavus PFAS study (2022): high PFAS concentrations reported in specific site samples — historical sampling, not current tap water. Open-access paper
- PFAS detected in Arctic surface snow/precipitation (2024, Environmental Science & Technology). Journal page
- ASCE — Alaska Infrastructure Report Card (2025): drinking water overview and statewide challenges. State summary
- Alaska DEC — Drinking Water Watch (public water system database). DWW portal
- Notes: Removed the blanket “low/no lead risk statewide” framing because it can’t be verified across every system and building. Lead risk is often driven by plumbing/materials at the property level; use your utility guidance and EPA lead rules for context.
- PFAS site results: Some studies report very high PFAS concentrations in specific site samples. Where referenced on this page, those values are clearly labeled as historical sampling (not current tap water).
- Affiliate disclosure: Any filter recommendation is framed as optional “extra protection.” We include a disclosure near the link, and the link is marked as sponsored.
Please read – our information
The information presented on cleanairandwater.net is compiled from official water quality reports, trusted news sources, government websites, and public health resources. While we strive for accuracy and thoroughness in our presentations, we are not scientists, engineers, or qualified water quality professionals.
Our mission is to present water quality information in an accessible, real-world format that helps people understand what’s in their water and make informed decisions about their health and safety. We believe that complex environmental information should be available to everyone in a format that’s easy to understand.
We make every effort to ensure our content is current and accurate, but we cannot guarantee that all information is complete or error-free. This website should not replace official communications from your local water utility or health department. We always recommend consulting official sources for the most up-to-date information regarding your specific water system.
Clean Air and Water is not liable for any unintentional errors, omissions, or outdated information. The content on this site is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered professional advice.

