Category: Health Safety

  • Home Water Testing Surges as Americans Question Tap Water Quality

    Home Water Testing Surges as Americans Question Tap Water Quality

    Home Water Testing Surges as Americans Question Tap Water Quality

    Meta Description: More Americans are testing their home water and buying filtration systems as concerns about tap water quality grow. Learn what’s driving this trend and how to make informed decisions about your water.

    Walk into any home improvement store lately and you’ll notice something interesting: the water filtration aisle is packed. People are buying test kits, installing whole-house systems, and asking a lot more questions about what’s coming out of their taps.

    Recent surveys show a clear shift in how Americans think about their drinking water. According to the 2024 Leaf Home Better Water Together Report, only 51% of Americans regularly drink tap water, while 69% now choose bottled water. Meanwhile, 70% of respondents in Aquasana’s 2023 survey expressed concerns about their unfiltered tap water qualityโ€”up from 34% just three years earlier.

    Interestingly, trust in bottled water as the “most trustworthy” source has also declined significantly, dropping from 41% in 2019 to 20% in 2023 according to Aquasanaโ€”a 51% decrease in preference over four years.

    This isn’t just a passing trend. Americans are fundamentally rethinking their relationship with tap water, and there are some pretty clear reasons why.

    Why Trust in Tap Water Is Shifting

    Recent events have shaped public perception:

    Several high-profile water crises have made headlines in recent years, creating lasting impressions on public consciousness. The ongoing situation in Flint, Michigan, Jackson, Mississippi’s water system failures, and the 2021 Texas winter storm that left millions without safe water have all contributed to heightened awareness about water system vulnerabilities.

    The numbers tell the story:

    • 51% of Americans regularly drink tap water (Leaf Home 2024)
    • 70% worry about unfiltered tap water quality (Aquasana 2023)
    • 59% of utility customers rate their water as safe to drink, meaning roughly 41% do not (J.D. Power 2024)
    • 63% have never tested their home water (Leaf Home 2024)
    • Trust in bottled water as “most trustworthy” dropped 51% from 2019 to 2023 (Aquasana)

    What’s driving the concern: People are hearing more about water quality issues than ever before. Boil water advisories that used to be rare local news items now get national attention. Social media amplifies stories about contamination discoveries. Parents are particularly concerned after reports of lead found in school water fountains across the country.

    The EPA’s establishment of the first PFAS drinking water standards in 2024โ€”with compliance required by 2029โ€”has also brought “forever chemicals” into mainstream conversation.

    The Home Water Testing Industry Responds

    Market growth reflects consumer demand:

    The home water testing market is experiencing significant growth as more people decide to check their water quality themselves. Companies selling DIY test kits, professional lab services, and filtration systems report increased demand.

    What people are buying:

    • At-home test kits for lead, bacteria, and various chemicals
    • Professional laboratory testing services
    • Point-of-use filtration systems
    • Whole-house water treatment systems
    • Specialized filters for specific contaminants

    Who’s testing their water: The trend crosses demographic lines but seems particularly strong among parents of young children, health-conscious millennials, and residents of areas that have experienced water quality issues. According to the Leaf Home survey, 63% of Americans have never tested their home water, suggesting significant room for market growth.

    Understanding the Infrastructure Challenge

    Real issues behind the concerns:

    Many American water systems face genuine challenges. Much of the country’s water infrastructure was built in the 1950s and 1960s and is now reaching the end of its designed lifespan. The American Society of Civil Engineers has consistently rated U.S. drinking water infrastructure as needing significant investment.

    Communication gaps: According to the J.D. Power 2024 study, while 59% of customers rate their water as safe to drink, roughly 41% do not share this confidence. The study also found that just 2% of customers recall receiving communication from their utility about PFAS contamination despite widespread news coverage. Additionally, the Leaf Home survey reported that 34% of customers don’t trust their home plumbing systems.

    Regulatory landscape: Federal drinking water standards for many contaminants haven’t been updated in over 20 years. The EPA’s new PFAS standards represent the first major expansion of regulated contaminants in decades. Thousands of chemicals used commercially have never been tested in drinking water supplies.

    What Home Testing Actually Reveals

    Common findings from water tests:

    When people test their water, they often discover various contaminants, though levels may or may not exceed federal safety standards. Common findings include:

    Metals:

    • Lead from older pipes and fixtures
    • Copper from plumbing corrosion
    • Arsenic from natural geological sources or industrial activities

    Chemical contaminants:

    • Chlorine and chloramine used in water treatment
    • PFAS compounds from various industrial sources
    • Agricultural chemicals from runoff
    • Pharmaceutical residues that standard treatment doesn’t remove

    Biological concerns:

    • Bacteria from aging distribution systems
    • Parasites that can survive standard treatment
    • Viruses during system failures or emergencies

    Many tests reveal multiple contaminants simultaneously, though individual levels may be within acceptable ranges.

    The Economics of Water Anxiety

    The financial impact is substantial:

    For households:

    • Quality home filtration systems range from $500 to $3,000
    • Annual filter replacements cost $100 to $500
    • Water testing typically costs $50 to $300 per test
    • Bottled water can cost $500 to $1,000+ annually for a family

    For the industry:

    • Water filtration companies report strong growth
    • Bottled water sales continue setting records
    • Testing laboratories are experiencing increased demand
    • Plumbing contractors are busy with filter installations

    For communities:

    • Water utilities face declining per-capita consumption
    • Businesses invest in filtration to maintain customer confidence
    • Schools and offices increasingly switch to bottled water
    • Property values may be affected in areas with known water issues

    Geographic and Demographic Patterns

    Where concerns are highest:

    Certain areas show higher levels of water quality concern, including communities near military bases (due to PFAS contamination), older cities with lead service lines, rural areas dependent on well water, and regions with industrial agriculture.

    Trust varies by demographic: The American Water Works Association 2024 survey reported interesting patterns in water utility trust:

    • 76% of White respondents trust their utility “a lot” or “some”
    • 73% of Hispanic respondents express similar trust levels
    • 65% of Black respondents report trusting their water utility
    • Younger generations generally express more concern than older generations

    Making Informed Decisions About Your Water

    Smart approaches to water quality:

    Start with information:

    • Request your water utility’s latest annual quality report
    • Check the EPA’s drinking water database for your area
    • Determine if your home has lead service lines
    • Research common contaminants in your region

    Consider testing if:

    • Your home was built before 1986 (potential lead issues)
    • Water has unusual taste, smell, or appearance
    • You live in an area with known contamination issues
    • You have vulnerable family members (pregnant women, infants)

    Choose filtration based on actual needs:

    • Activated carbon filters for chlorine taste and some chemicals
    • Reverse osmosis systems for comprehensive contaminant removal
    • Lead-specific filters if testing reveals lead presence
    • UV systems if biological contamination is a concern

    Practical steps:

    • Get informed about your specific water quality before purchasing equipment
    • Test strategically for contaminants known to be issues in your area
    • Match filtration systems to your actual water quality needs
    • Stay updated on communications from your water utility

    The Broader Implications

    What this trend means:

    The shift away from tap water reflects broader changes in how Americans view public institutions and infrastructure. When people don’t trust their water supply, they take individual action to protect themselves and their families.

    Long-term considerations:

    • Increased plastic waste from bottled water consumption
    • Growing disparity between families who can afford filtration and those who can’t
    • Reduced public support for water infrastructure investment
    • Additional pressure on municipal water systems

    What needs to happen:

    • Continued investment in water infrastructure modernization
    • Stronger regulation of industrial chemicals that can contaminate water supplies
    • Better communication between water utilities and customers
    • Proactive testing and treatment rather than reactive crisis management

    American tap water remains among the safest in the world, with strict federal standards and regular testing. However, public confidence requires more than just meeting minimum standardsโ€”it requires transparency, communication, and proactive improvements to aging infrastructure.

    The trend toward home water testing and filtration reflects a desire for personal control over water quality. While this individual action can provide peace of mind, it also highlights the need for continued investment in public water systems that serve everyone, regardless of their ability to buy their own filtration equipment.

    Whether your water needs additional treatment depends on your specific situation, but having accurate information about your water quality is always a good foundation for making informed decisions.


    Sources: Leaf Home 2024 Better Water Together Report, Aquasana 2023 Water Quality Survey, J.D. Power 2024 Water Utility Customer Satisfaction Study, American Water Works Association 2024 Public Perceptions polling, Environmental Working Group Tap Water Database

    Last Updated: June 30, 2025

    Check your water now!

    We have translated and compiled water reports on every state in the US, and covered over 100 cities. Find out how good your water is today!

    Glass of clean water

    Please read – our information

    The information presented on cleanairandwater.net is compiled from official water quality reports, trusted news sources, government websites, and public health resources. While we strive for accuracy and thoroughness in our presentations, we are not scientists, engineers, or qualified water quality professionals.


    Our mission is to present water quality information in an accessible, real-world format that helps people understand what’s in their water and make informed decisions about their health and safety. We believe that complex environmental information should be available to everyone in a format that’s easy to understand.


    We make every effort to ensure our content is current and accurate, but we cannot guarantee that all information is complete or error-free. This website should not replace official communications from your local water utility or health department. We always recommend consulting official sources for the most up-to-date information regarding your specific water system.


    Clean Air and Water is not liable for any unintentional errors, omissions, or outdated information. The content on this site is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered professional advice.

    Site Logo for menu
  • Is Your Child’s School Water Safe? New Testing Reveals Lead Contamination at Schools Nationwide

    Is Your Child’s School Water Safe? New Testing Reveals Lead Contamination at Schools Nationwide

    Picture this: your kid walks up to the water fountain at school, takes a drink, and unknowingly consumes lead – a neurotoxin that can permanently damage their developing brain. Sound like a nightmare? For thousands of families across America, it’s becoming reality.

    New testing data from schools nationwide is revealing something that should terrify every parent: lead contamination in school drinking water is way more common than anyone wants to admit. We’re talking about schools where kids have been drinking water with lead levels hundreds – sometimes thousands – of times higher than what’s considered safe.

    The most gut-wrenching part? Many parents have absolutely no idea this is happening at their child’s school. Most states don’t even require schools to test their water for lead, and when they do find contamination, parents often don’t get told about it.

    The Shocking Reality of What Kids Are Drinking at School

    Here’s what recent testing has actually found:

    The numbers are honestly terrifying when you start digging into what’s been discovered at schools across the country:

    Real examples that will make you sick:

    • Schools in Ohio, Illinois, and Massachusetts have found drinking fountains with lead levels far exceeding EPA action levels
    • Some individual fixtures have tested at hundreds of times higher than regulatory thresholds
    • Environment America’s research has documented extreme contamination cases across multiple states
    • Recent state testing programs consistently find lead in school water systems

    The scope of the problem:

    • Many school districts don’t regularly test for lead in drinking water
    • Among districts that do test, a significant portion find detectable lead levels
    • Just 9 states and Washington D.C. have mandatory testing laws
    • Most parents have no clue their kids might be drinking contaminated water

    Why this is so dangerous for kids: Lead is basically poison for developing brains. Even tiny amounts can cause:

    • Learning disabilities and reduced IQ
    • Attention problems and behavioral issues
    • Stunted growth and development
    • Hearing problems
    • Damage to the nervous system

    Health experts, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, emphasize that there is no level of lead exposure that’s been proven safe for children.

    How Lead Gets Into Your Child’s School Water

    It’s not coming from the city water supply:

    Most school lead contamination doesn’t come from the municipal water system. The water arriving at the school is usually fine. The problem happens inside the building itself.

    Where the lead actually comes from:

    • Old water fountains with lead-containing parts
    • Brass faucets and fixtures that contain lead
    • Lead solder in pipe joints
    • Old plumbing systems installed before lead was banned
    • Water sitting in pipes overnight, especially over weekends

    The “first drink” problem: Here’s something schools don’t want you to know: lead levels are often highest first thing in the morning when water has been sitting in pipes all night. So that first drink your kid takes at school? It might be the most contaminated water they’ll encounter all day.

    Why schools aren’t catching this: Many schools only do “first draw” sampling, which doesn’t capture water that’s been sitting in contact with lead pipes away from the tap. This means they’re missing a lot of contamination.

    Which Schools Are Most at Risk (And How to Find Out About Yours)

    Your child is most likely to be exposed if they attend:

    Older schools:

    • Buildings constructed before 1986 (when lead pipes were banned)
    • Schools that haven’t updated their plumbing systems
    • Buildings with original water fountains and fixtures

    Schools in certain states:

    • States without mandatory testing requirements
    • Areas with older infrastructure
    • School districts with limited budgets for maintenance

    Specific types of facilities:

    • Elementary schools (younger kids are most vulnerable)
    • Preschools and daycare centers
    • Schools that rely on well water

    How to find out about your child’s school:

    Ask these specific questions:

    • When was the last time drinking water was tested for lead?
    • What were the results, and can you see them?
    • Which water fountains or faucets tested highest?
    • What actions has the school taken to address any contamination?
    • Does the school have a written policy about lead testing?

    Red flags to watch for:

    • School won’t provide test results or says they “don’t have them”
    • Testing was done more than 3 years ago
    • School only tested a few outlets, not all drinking water sources
    • Results show detectable lead levels above regulatory action thresholds

    What Schools Should Be Doing (But Most Aren’t)

    The gold standard for school water safety:

    Proper testing protocol:

    • Test every single drinking water outlet annually
    • Include extended-sitting samples, not just first draw
    • Use certified labs and proper sampling procedures
    • Make all results public and easily accessible to parents

    Immediate action when lead is found:

    • Shut off contaminated fountains and faucets immediately
    • Provide bottled water or install certified lead-removal filters
    • Replace any fixtures or plumbing that contains lead
    • Retest after fixes to ensure contamination is gone

    Ongoing prevention:

    • Install lead-free fixtures in all renovations
    • Flush water systems regularly, especially after breaks
    • Monitor and maintain filtration systems if installed
    • Train staff on proper water safety procedures
    • Follow EPA and state guidelines for action levels and remediation

    How to Protect Your Child Right Now

    Don’t wait for your school to act:

    Immediate steps:

    • Send your child to school with their own water bottle filled at home
    • If you have a home water filter, use it to fill their bottle
    • Tell your child to avoid drinking from school fountains until you verify they’re safe
    • Request lead testing results from your school in writing

    Home water safety:

    • Test your home’s water for lead, especially if you live in an older house
    • Install a certified lead-removal filter if needed
    • Run cold water for 30 seconds before drinking if water has been sitting
    • Never use hot water from the tap for drinking or cooking

    Advocate for change:

    • Join or organize other parents to demand lead testing at your school
    • Attend school board meetings and ask about water safety policies
    • Contact your state representatives about mandatory school testing laws
    • Support candidates who prioritize school infrastructure funding

    ๐Ÿ’ก Take Action This Week:

    • Request test results: Contact your school and ask for recent lead testing data in writing
    • Test your home water: Get a certified lead test kit or hire a professional
    • Join parent groups: Connect with other parents concerned about school water safety
    • Install home filtration: Invest in a quality water filter that removes lead

    The States That Are Actually Protecting Kids (And the Ones That Aren’t)

    States with mandatory testing:

    • California, Illinois, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington D.C.
    • These states require regular testing and public reporting of results

    States making progress:

    • Colorado recently passed comprehensive school water testing laws
    • Massachusetts requires testing and has strict action levels
    • Texas has voluntary programs with state funding

    States doing almost nothing: Many states still have no requirements for schools to test drinking water for lead. If your state isn’t on the “good” list above, your child’s school probably isn’t required to test their water.

    The Financial Reality: Why Schools Resist Testing

    The ugly truth about why schools avoid lead testing:

    It’s not about the testing cost: Lead testing only costs $100-200 per sample. That’s not what schools are worried about.

    It’s about what happens when they find lead:

    • Replacing a single contaminated water fountain can cost $1,000-5,000
    • Major plumbing overhauls can cost hundreds of thousands
    • Installing filtration systems requires ongoing maintenance costs
    • Legal liability if they knew about contamination and didn’t act

    The perverse incentive: Many schools figure it’s better not to test because then they can’t be held responsible for what they don’t know. This is obviously terrible for kids, but it’s the financial reality schools face.

    What Needs to Change (And How You Can Help Make It Happen)

    The policy changes we need:

    Federal requirements:

    • Mandatory lead testing for all schools receiving federal funding
    • Required public reporting of all test results
    • Federal funding to help schools fix contamination problems
    • Standards for replacement fixtures and maintenance

    State-level action:

    • Mandatory annual testing laws in every state
    • Action level of zero (any detectable lead requires immediate action)
    • Required notification to parents within 24 hours of finding contamination
    • State funding for remediation in low-income districts

    How you can make a difference:

    • Vote for candidates who support school infrastructure funding
    • Contact your representatives about federal school water testing requirements
    • Support local school bond measures that include water system upgrades
    • Volunteer with organizations pushing for school water safety

    Look, the reality is that your child’s school water might not be safe, and you probably won’t know unless you specifically ask for test results. The system is set up to keep parents in the dark about this issue.

    But here’s what you can control: you can send your kid to school with safe water from home, you can demand transparency from your school, and you can join other parents in pushing for real change.

    Your child’s developing brain is too precious to leave to chance. Don’t assume their school water is safe – verify it. And if it’s not safe, don’t wait for bureaucrats to fix it. Take action to protect your kid right now.


    Sources: Environment America Research & Policy Center school water testing data, EPA voluntary school lead testing grant program, State-by-state school water testing requirements, CBS News investigative reporting on school water safety

    Last Updated: June 30, 2025

    Check your water now!

    We have translated and compiled water reports on every state in the US, and covered over 100 cities. Find out how good your water is today!

    Glass of clean water

    Please read – our information

    The information presented on cleanairandwater.net is compiled from official water quality reports, trusted news sources, government websites, and public health resources. While we strive for accuracy and thoroughness in our presentations, we are not scientists, engineers, or qualified water quality professionals.


    Our mission is to present water quality information in an accessible, real-world format that helps people understand what’s in their water and make informed decisions about their health and safety. We believe that complex environmental information should be available to everyone in a format that’s easy to understand.


    We make every effort to ensure our content is current and accurate, but we cannot guarantee that all information is complete or error-free. This website should not replace official communications from your local water utility or health department. We always recommend consulting official sources for the most up-to-date information regarding your specific water system.


    Clean Air and Water is not liable for any unintentional errors, omissions, or outdated information. The content on this site is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered professional advice.

    Site Logo for menu
  • Grid Failures Leave Millions Scrambling for Safe Water – Why This Crisis Is Getting Worse

    Grid Failures Leave Millions Scrambling for Safe Water – Why This Crisis Is Getting Worse

    When the power goes out, most people worry about losing their lights and heating. But there’s a much bigger problem that most folks don’t think about until it’s too late: when the electricity fails, so does your water system.

    We’ve been seeing this nightmare scenario play out more and more across the country. Major power outages are knocking out water treatment plants and leaving entire cities without safe drinking water for days or even weeks. And honestly? Our infrastructure is so fragile that it’s only going to get worse.

    The wake-up call came during that brutal winter storm in Texas back in 2021, but it’s been happening everywhere since then. From Jackson, Mississippi to communities across the South, power failures are creating water crises that affect millions of Americans.

    How Power Outages Actually Destroy Your Water Supply

    Here’s what happens when the lights go out at your water treatment plant:

    Most people have no clue how dependent their water system is on electricity. Every step of getting clean water to your tap requires power:

    The treatment process needs electricity for:

    • Pumps that move water through the system
    • Chemical injection systems that kill bacteria and viruses
    • Filtration equipment that removes contaminants
    • Monitoring systems that ensure water quality
    • Pressure systems that deliver water to your home

    When the power fails:

    • Water treatment plants shut down completely
    • Existing treated water in storage tanks runs out within hours
    • Pumps can’t maintain water pressure throughout the system
    • Without pressure, contaminated water can flow backward into clean pipes
    • Bacteria and other nasties start growing in stagnant water

    The cascade effect: Once a water system goes down, it’s not just a matter of flipping the power back on. Plants have to flush contaminated water, test everything for safety, and slowly bring systems back online. This process can take days or weeks.

    Real Examples That Show How Bad This Problem Is

    The Texas disaster that shocked everyone:

    In February 2021, that massive winter storm didn’t just knock out power for millions of Texans – it completely destroyed water systems across the state. Over 800 local public water systems were affected, with millions of gallons of treated water lost through burst pipes and failed treatment plants.

    Cities like Austin lost hundreds of millions of gallons of water. Residents were told to boil water for weeks, but many couldn’t even do that because they had no power for their stoves.

    Jackson, Mississippi – when infrastructure completely fails:

    Jackson’s water problems are the perfect example of what happens when you combine crumbling infrastructure with power grid failures. This city has basically become a real-time experiment in how NOT to run a water system.

    Here’s what’s been going down: Back in 2021, a winter storm knocked out their main water treatment plant, and suddenly 150,000 people had no water for more than a month. Think about that – an entire month without being able to turn on your tap.

    But the nightmare didn’t stop there. In 2022, heavy rains caused flooding that shut down their water treatment plant again. This time, 180,000 people lost access to safe drinking water. The city has issued boil water notices over 300 times since 2018 – that’s basically every few days.

    What makes Jackson’s situation so maddening is that this isn’t just bad luck. The city’s water infrastructure is over 100 years old in some places, and nobody wanted to spend the money to fix it until everything started falling apart. Now they’re looking at a $2 billion repair bill.

    Why these aren’t isolated incidents:

    • Puerto Rico’s water systems collapsed after Hurricane Maria and still haven’t fully recovered
    • Winter storms regularly knock out water systems across the South
    • Extreme heat causes power grids to fail, taking water plants offline
    • Aging infrastructure means small power disruptions cause major water failures

    The Hidden Reasons This Crisis Is Exploding

    Our water infrastructure was never built for climate extremes:

    Most water treatment plants were designed decades ago when extreme weather was rare. Now we’re seeing:

    More frequent grid failures:

    • Heat waves that overwhelm electrical systems
    • Winter storms that freeze power lines and equipment
    • Flooding that shorts out electrical systems
    • Hurricanes that destroy power infrastructure for weeks

    Aging water systems that can’t handle disruptions:

    • Many treatment plants are 50-100 years old
    • Backup generators that don’t work or run out of fuel
    • No redundant systems if the main plant fails
    • Pipes that burst when pressure drops during outages

    The financial reality: Most water utilities are broke. They don’t have money for backup power systems, infrastructure upgrades, or emergency planning. When disaster strikes, they’re completely unprepared.

    Which Communities Are Most at Risk

    You’re especially vulnerable if you live in:

    Areas with aging infrastructure:

    • Cities in the South and Midwest with old water systems
    • Rural communities that can’t afford upgrades
    • Low-income areas that have been neglected for decades

    Climate-vulnerable regions:

    • Texas and the Gulf Coast (hurricanes and extreme weather)
    • The Southeast (ice storms and heat waves)
    • California (wildfires that knock out power lines)
    • Puerto Rico and other territories (hurricane-prone areas)

    Communities that depend on single treatment plants:

    • Small towns with only one water facility
    • Cities that haven’t invested in backup systems
    • Areas with no redundancy in their water supply

    The environmental justice angle: Let’s be real – wealthy communities have backup plans and resources. Poor communities, especially communities of color, get left behind when water systems fail. Jackson, Mississippi is 82% Black and has been dealing with water crises for years while getting minimal help.

    What Happens to Your Family When the Water Goes Out

    The immediate health risks:

    When power failures shut down water treatment, you’re not just dealing with inconvenience – you’re facing serious health threats:

    Contaminated water can contain:

    • E. coli and other dangerous bacteria
    • Viruses that cause severe illness
    • Chemical contaminants that weren’t filtered out
    • Lead and other heavy metals from old pipes

    The impacts on daily life:

    • No water for drinking, cooking, or cleaning
    • Toilets that don’t flush
    • No showers or baths
    • Restaurants and businesses forced to close
    • Schools that can’t operate safely

    Long-term consequences: Even after power is restored, water systems often remain unsafe for weeks. Boil water advisories become the norm, and many people never trust their tap water again.

    Why Traditional Emergency Plans Don’t Work

    The problem with current disaster response:

    Most emergency planning focuses on getting the power back on, not on keeping water systems running during outages.

    What usually happens:

    • Power companies prioritize hospitals and emergency services
    • Water treatment plants are often low priority for power restoration
    • By the time power is restored, water systems are already contaminated
    • It takes days or weeks to get safe water flowing again

    The backup generator myth: Many treatment plants have backup generators, but they:

    • Often don’t work when needed
    • Run out of fuel within hours
    • Can’t power entire treatment operations
    • Haven’t been properly maintained

    Steps You Can Take to Protect Your Family

    Don’t wait for disaster to strike:

    Prepare for water emergencies:

    • Store at least one gallon of water per person per day for 3-7 days
    • Keep extra water for cooking, cleaning, and pets
    • Have water purification tablets or a good filtration system
    • Know where to get emergency water if your system fails

    Understand your local water system:

    • Find out if your community has backup power for water treatment
    • Learn where your water comes from and how it’s treated
    • Ask your utility about emergency plans and backup systems
    • Know the signs of water contamination

    Install home backup systems:

    • Consider a whole-house water filtration system
    • Have a backup water source like a well if possible
    • Install water storage tanks if you have space
    • Get a generator that can power essential water systems

    ๐Ÿ’ก Emergency Action Plan:

    • Know your water source: Contact your utility to understand their backup power situation
    • Build water reserves: Store emergency water now, before you need it
    • Have filtration backup: Invest in quality water filters that don’t need electricity
    • Stay informed: Sign up for emergency alerts from your water utility

    The Long-Term Infrastructure Problem

    Why this crisis will keep getting worse:

    The American Society of Civil Engineers gave our drinking water infrastructure a C- grade. That means we’re looking at $625 billion in needed repairs over the next 20 years.

    The funding gap:

    • Water utilities need massive investments in backup power systems
    • Most communities can’t afford infrastructure upgrades
    • Federal funding is a drop in the bucket compared to actual needs
    • Rate increases get pushback from customers

    Climate change is making everything worse:

    • More extreme weather means more power outages
    • Aging systems can’t handle increasing stress
    • Emergency repairs are more expensive than preventive upgrades
    • Some communities may become uninhabitable due to repeated water failures

    What Needs to Change (And What You Can Do About It)

    The solutions exist, but we need political will:

    What water utilities should do:

    • Install redundant backup power systems at all treatment plants
    • Upgrade aging infrastructure before it fails
    • Create regional partnerships so communities can share resources
    • Invest in distributed water systems that are more resilient

    What governments should do:

    • Prioritize water infrastructure in emergency planning
    • Require backup power for critical water facilities
    • Fund infrastructure upgrades before disasters strike
    • Create regional emergency water supplies

    What you can do:

    • Contact your representatives about water infrastructure funding
    • Ask your local utility about their emergency preparedness
    • Support candidates who prioritize infrastructure investment
    • Prepare your household for water emergencies

    The reality is that our water infrastructure is falling apart, and power grid failures are just exposing how vulnerable we really are. Every extreme weather event is a reminder that clean, safe water isn’t guaranteed – it’s something we have to fight for and invest in.

    Don’t wait for your community to become the next Jackson, Mississippi or the next Texas disaster. Start preparing now, and start demanding better from your leaders. Your family’s access to safe water might depend on it.


    Sources: ASCE Infrastructure Report Card, Jackson Mississippi water crisis documentation, Texas winter storm 2021 analysis, EPA water infrastructure assessments

    Last Updated: June 30, 2025

    Check your water now!

    We have translated and compiled water reports on every state in the US, and covered over 100 cities. Find out how good your water is today!

    Glass of clean water

    Please read – our information

    The information presented on cleanairandwater.net is compiled from official water quality reports, trusted news sources, government websites, and public health resources. While we strive for accuracy and thoroughness in our presentations, we are not scientists, engineers, or qualified water quality professionals.


    Our mission is to present water quality information in an accessible, real-world format that helps people understand what’s in their water and make informed decisions about their health and safety. We believe that complex environmental information should be available to everyone in a format that’s easy to understand.


    We make every effort to ensure our content is current and accurate, but we cannot guarantee that all information is complete or error-free. This website should not replace official communications from your local water utility or health department. We always recommend consulting official sources for the most up-to-date information regarding your specific water system.


    Clean Air and Water is not liable for any unintentional errors, omissions, or outdated information. The content on this site is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered professional advice.

    Site Logo for menu
  • New Study Finds Bottled Water Contains 60x More Microplastics Than Tap โ€” Should You Be Worried?

    New Study Finds Bottled Water Contains 60x More Microplastics Than Tap โ€” Should You Be Worried?

    So you’ve been buying bottled water thinking you’re making the healthy choice? I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but recent research just completely destroyed that assumption. Scientists at Columbia and Rutgers universities dropped a bombshell: the average bottle of water contains around 240,000 microscopic plastic pieces.

    Yeah, that’s not a typo. A quarter of a million tiny plastic particles floating around in what you thought was “pure” water. And get this – your regular tap water has about 60 times fewer plastic particles than the bottled stuff you’re paying premium prices for.

    I’ll be honest, when I first saw these numbers, I thought there had to be some mistake. But multiple studies are all showing the same thing: that plastic bottle is literally contaminating the water inside it with thousands of invisible particles every time you take a sip.

    What This Means for Your Daily Water Habits

    Bottom line: Every time you drink from a plastic bottle, you’re consuming thousands of invisible plastic particles that are small enough to enter your bloodstream.

    Here’s what the research actually found:

    The shocking numbers:

    • Bottled water averages 240,000 plastic particles per liter
    • That’s about 60 times more microplastics than tap water
    • Some bottles tested had up to 400,000 particles per liter
    • 90% of these particles are nanoplastics – so small they can cross into your organs

    What these particles can do:

    • Enter your bloodstream and travel to organs
    • Cross the blood-brain barrier into your brain
    • Pass through the placenta to unborn babies
    • Accumulate in your liver, heart, and other tissues
    • Potentially trigger inflammation and immune responses

    Where the contamination comes from: The plastic isn’t just floating around randomly. Scientists found it’s coming from:

    • The bottle itself, which constantly sheds tiny particles
    • The bottle cap – each twist releases about 500 microplastic particles
    • The reverse osmosis filters used to “purify” the water
    • Heat exposure during shipping and storage

    How This Contamination Actually Happens

    It’s not just about old, beat-up bottles:

    Even brand-new plastic bottles start shedding particles the moment water touches them. The process gets worse when bottles are exposed to heat – like in delivery trucks, warehouses, or your car on a hot day.

    The researchers looked at bottles from major brands (they won’t say which ones yet, but they were common brands you’d find at Walmart) and found contamination across the board. This isn’t a problem with just cheap water – it’s happening with premium brands too.

    The cap problem nobody talks about: Every time you screw and unscrew that plastic cap, you’re creating friction that generates microplastics. Think about how many times you’ve opened and closed a water bottle throughout the day. Each twist is adding more plastic particles to your water.

    Heat makes everything worse: Leave a plastic bottle in your car on a hot day? You’ve potentially tripled the microplastic contamination. The study found bottles exposed to heat can reach over 300,000 particles per liter.

    Even “BPA-free” bottles aren’t safe: Don’t think that “BPA-free” label on your bottle means you’re protected. These bottles still shed other types of plastic particles that we don’t fully understand yet.

    Tap Water: The Surprising Winner

    Here’s something that’ll probably surprise you:

    Multiple studies now show that tap water consistently contains fewer microplastics than bottled water. Water treatment plants are actually pretty good at filtering out these particles, while plastic bottles are constantly adding new ones.

    Why tap water is cleaner:

    • Municipal water treatment removes most microplastics
    • No plastic packaging to contaminate the water
    • Regulated testing for contaminants (unlike bottled water)
    • Glass and metal pipes don’t shed particles like plastic bottles do

    The research backs this up:

    • Studies found tap water averaged about 4,000 particles per liter
    • Bottled water averaged 240,000 particles per liter
    • That’s a 60-fold difference in plastic contamination
    • Even groundwater sources showed less contamination than plastic bottles

    What You Can Actually Do About This

    Stop freaking out and start making better choices:

    The good news is you have options that are both healthier and cheaper:

    Your best bets:

    • Filtered tap water: Install a good carbon filter system and you’ll remove up to 99.9% of microplastics
    • Glass bottles: If you need portable water, glass-bottled brands showed dramatically lower plastic contamination
    • Stainless steel containers: Fill a quality steel bottle with filtered tap water – zero ongoing plastic exposure

    Filters that actually work:

    • Carbon block filters with 1-micron capability
    • Reverse osmosis systems (ironically, the same tech bottled water companies use)
    • Multi-stage filtration systems
    • Avoid basic pitcher filters – they don’t catch microplastics

    If you must use plastic bottles:

    • Keep them cool and out of sunlight
    • Don’t reuse single-use bottles
    • Drink the water before the expiration date
    • Minimize opening and closing the cap

    ๐Ÿ’ก Action Steps for This Week:

    • Calculate your exposure: How many plastic bottles do you drink per week? Multiply by 240,000 particles
    • Research home filters: Look into certified microplastic removal systems
    • Try tap water: Do a taste test between filtered tap and your usual bottled brand
    • Invest in reusables: Get a quality glass or steel water bottle

    The Health Implications We’re Just Starting to Understand

    What scientists are worried about:

    The thing is, we’re all part of a massive uncontrolled experiment right now. These nanoplastics are so new that researchers are still figuring out what they do to our bodies.

    What we know so far:

    • Microplastics have been found in human blood, lungs, and even placental tissue
    • They can carry other chemicals and toxins into your body
    • Smaller particles (nanoplastics) are more dangerous because they can go anywhere in your body
    • Early studies suggest they might cause inflammation and immune system problems

    The long-term concerns: Scientists are particularly worried about nanoplastics because they’re small enough to cross the blood-brain barrier. That means they could potentially affect brain function, though we don’t know how yet.

    Why this matters for families: If you’re pregnant or have young kids, this research is especially concerning. These particles can cross the placenta and affect developing babies. Kids who grow up drinking primarily bottled water could be exposed to millions of plastic particles during their critical development years.

    The Industry Response (Or Lack Thereof)

    Don’t expect bottled water companies to be helpful:

    When researchers tried to get information from major bottled water brands about their microplastic testing protocols, most gave vague responses about “meeting regulatory requirements.” The problem? There currently aren’t comprehensive regulatory requirements for microplastic testing.

    The marketing vs. reality disconnect: Companies are still marketing bottled water as “pure” and “natural” while selling it in containers that are actively contaminating the product. It’s like selling organic food in pesticide-coated packaging.

    What needs to change: We need mandatory microplastic testing for all bottled water, clear labeling about contamination levels, and industry investment in truly plastic-free packaging alternatives.

    The Financial Reality Check

    You’re paying more for worse water:

    Think about this: you’re spending 1,000 times more for bottled water than tap water, and you’re getting 60 times more plastic contamination in return. That’s not just bad for your health – it’s a terrible deal financially.

    Do the math:

    • Average family spends $500+ per year on bottled water
    • Good home filtration system: $200-500 one-time cost
    • Filtered tap water: Cleaner than bottled, costs pennies per gallon

    Here’s What I Think About All This

    Look, the bottled water industry has been pulling a fast one on all of us for years. They’ve convinced millions of people to pay 1,000 times more for water that’s actually more contaminated than what comes out of their kitchen faucet.

    The crazy part is that the cleanest water was literally sitting in your house this whole time. Filtered tap water beats bottled water in almost every category – it’s cleaner, cheaper, and doesn’t create a mountain of plastic waste.

    Should you panic about every plastic bottle you’ve ever consumed? Absolutely not. But should you think twice before buying your next case of bottled water? Probably.

    The way I see it, this research gives you a perfect excuse to save money and reduce your plastic exposure at the same time. Install a decent filter, get a reusable bottle, and stop paying companies to sell you contaminated water in plastic containers.

    Your health deserves better than 240,000 plastic particles per liter. And honestly? Your wallet does too.


    Sources: Columbia University and Rutgers University nanoplastics research (January 2024), Environmental Working Group microplastics database, Multiple peer-reviewed studies on microplastics in drinking water

    Last Updated: June 30, 2025

    Check your water now!

    We have translated and compiled water reports on every state in the US, and covered over 100 cities. Find out how good your water is today!

    Glass of clean water

    Please read – our information

    The information presented on cleanairandwater.net is compiled from official water quality reports, trusted news sources, government websites, and public health resources. While we strive for accuracy and thoroughness in our presentations, we are not scientists, engineers, or qualified water quality professionals.


    Our mission is to present water quality information in an accessible, real-world format that helps people understand what’s in their water and make informed decisions about their health and safety. We believe that complex environmental information should be available to everyone in a format that’s easy to understand.


    We make every effort to ensure our content is current and accurate, but we cannot guarantee that all information is complete or error-free. This website should not replace official communications from your local water utility or health department. We always recommend consulting official sources for the most up-to-date information regarding your specific water system.


    Clean Air and Water is not liable for any unintentional errors, omissions, or outdated information. The content on this site is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered professional advice.

    Site Logo for menu

  • Portable Lead Detection Sensor Gives Communities Instant Water Safety Results

    Portable Lead Detection Sensor Gives Communities Instant Water Safety Results

    Imagine being able to test your tap water for dangerous lead contamination in just 5 minutes, right in your own kitchen, and get results as accurate as a professional laboratory. That’s exactly what scientists at the University of Massachusetts Lowell have created with a revolutionary handheld device called the “E-Tongue.”

    This portable sensor is already being used by hundreds of families across Massachusetts to instantly check if their drinking water contains unsafe levels of lead. Here’s how this breakthrough technology is changing water safety testing.

    What the E-Tongue Actually Does

    The E-Tongue is a portable, handheld device that connects to your smartphone and can detect lead in tap water within 5 minutes. Unlike traditional water testing that requires sending samples to laboratories and waiting days or weeks for results, this device gives you instant, accurate readings right at home.

    How it works:

    • You add a small sample of tap water to a glass vial with a buffer solution
    • Insert the E-Tongue sensor into the vial
    • The device applies voltage to make lead ions stick to its gold electrode
    • It reverses the voltage to release the lead, creating an electrical current
    • The strength of the current tells you exactly how much lead is in your water

    What you see: The connected smartphone app shows results with a simple color code – green means your water is safe (below EPA limits), red means dangerous levels of lead are present. You also get the exact concentration numbers.

    Real-World Testing Shows It Works

    This isn’t just laboratory theory – the E-Tongue has been tested by real families in real communities. Researchers worked with 317 residents across four Massachusetts towns (Andover, Lawrence, Dracut, and Lowell) who collected 634 water samples using the device.

    The results were eye-opening:

    • 10 samples exceeded EPA’s maximum allowed lead level of 10 parts per billion
    • Several other samples came close to the danger threshold
    • The E-Tongue’s readings matched traditional laboratory tests for accuracy
    • Residents found the device easy to use with just three simple steps

    Community impact: The testing revealed significant differences between towns. For example, Andover had more alkaline water while Lawrence had neutral pH levels. This kind of detailed, community-wide data helps local officials understand exactly where lead problems exist.

    Why This Matters for Your Family

    Lead contamination in drinking water is a serious health threat that often goes undetected until it’s too late. Even tiny amounts of lead can harm the brain and nervous system, especially in young children.

    The current problem:

    • Traditional lead testing costs hundreds of dollars and takes weeks
    • Many families can’t afford professional testing
    • By the time contamination is discovered, exposure may have already occurred
    • Communities often don’t know they have a problem until there’s a crisis

    How the E-Tongue changes everything:

    • Instant results mean immediate action if lead is found
    • Low cost makes testing accessible to everyone
    • Families can test as often as they want
    • Communities can identify problems before they become disasters

    “I was driven by the reality that families could be unknowingly exposed to lead,” says Dr. Pradeep Kurup, the principal investigator who developed the E-Tongue. “We are putting knowledge and power directly into people’s hands so they can protect their health and advocate for safer water in their communities.”

    How Accurate Is It Really?

    The E-Tongue isn’t just a rough estimate – it’s scientifically validated technology that performs as well as professional laboratory equipment.

    Technical specifications:

    • Detection limit: 1.6 parts per billion (better than EPA requirements)
    • Testing range: 5-200 parts per billion
    • Accuracy: 84-105% recovery rate compared to lab tests
    • Consistency: Less than 10% variation between repeated tests

    Laboratory validation: When the E-Tongue detected lead above EPA limits, researchers verified every result using certified laboratory testing. The device’s readings consistently matched the professional analysis.

    Real-world reliability: The device works even when other metals like copper are present in the water, which can interfere with some testing methods.

    The Technology Behind the Breakthrough

    The E-Tongue represents a major advance in portable water testing technology. Here’s what makes it special:

    Advanced electrode design:

    • Uses gold nanostar-modified electrodes for precise detection
    • Mercury-free design makes it safe for home use
    • Screen-printed carbon electrodes keep costs low

    Smart chemistry:

    • Non-toxic buffer solution (sodium acetate and potassium ferrocyanide)
    • Voltammetric detection method provides quantitative results
    • Works reliably across different water chemistry conditions

    User-friendly app:

    • Color-coded results anyone can understand
    • Stores test results and location data
    • Can share information with local authorities
    • Provides contamination severity indicators

    Current Availability and Cost

    The E-Tongue is currently in the research and testing phase, but Dr. Kurup says it should be available for community use within the next few years.

    Development status:

    • Successfully tested with 317 households
    • Ongoing validation studies in Massachusetts communities
    • Working toward commercial production
    • Estimated to be available for public use within 2-3 years

    Expected cost: While final pricing hasn’t been announced, researchers designed the device to be low-cost and accessible to average families – a major improvement over current testing options that can cost hundreds of dollars.

    Current access: Some Massachusetts communities are participating in ongoing research studies that provide free testing with the E-Tongue.

    How This Compares to Other Testing Options

    Understanding your current options helps you appreciate why the E-Tongue is such a breakthrough:

    Traditional laboratory testing:

    • Cost: $100-500 per test
    • Time: 1-3 weeks for results
    • Accuracy: Very high
    • Convenience: Must mail samples, wait for results

    Home test kits:

    • Cost: $20-50
    • Time: Instant to several days
    • Accuracy: Often unreliable, especially for particles
    • Convenience: Easy to use but results can be unclear

    E-Tongue:

    • Cost: Expected to be low (final pricing TBD)
    • Time: 5 minutes
    • Accuracy: Matches laboratory standards
    • Convenience: Instant results with clear readings

    What This Means for Communities

    The E-Tongue has the potential to revolutionize how communities approach water safety:

    Preventing water crises: Instead of waiting for disasters like Flint, Michigan, communities can identify problems early and take action before people get sick.

    Empowering residents: Families no longer have to rely solely on municipal testing or expensive laboratory analysis to know if their water is safe.

    Better data: Widespread testing creates detailed maps of water quality that help officials target infrastructure improvements where they’re needed most.

    Community advocacy: When residents have their own test results, they can better advocate for clean water improvements with local governments.

    Who Should Be Most Interested

    While everyone wants safe drinking water, certain groups face higher risks and would benefit most from instant lead testing:

    Families with young children: Lead is especially harmful to developing brains, making quick testing crucial for parents.

    Residents of older homes: Houses built before 1986 are more likely to have lead pipes or plumbing fixtures.

    Urban communities: Older cities often have aging infrastructure with higher lead contamination risks.

    Environmental justice communities: Low-income areas and communities of color often face higher exposure risks and have less access to professional testing.

    The Future of Water Testing

    The E-Tongue represents a shift toward democratizing water quality testing. Instead of relying on infrequent municipal testing or expensive laboratory analysis, families could soon have the power to monitor their own water safety.

    Next steps in development:

    • Expanding testing to more communities
    • Working toward FDA/EPA approval for commercial use
    • Reducing costs through mass production
    • Training community groups to use the technology

    Broader implications:

    • Could prevent future water contamination crises
    • Might lead to faster infrastructure improvements
    • Could reduce health disparities in water quality
    • May inspire development of sensors for other contaminants

    Bottom Line: A Game-Changer for Water Safety

    The E-Tongue portable lead sensor represents a major breakthrough in making water safety testing accessible to everyone. By providing instant, accurate results that match laboratory standards, this technology puts the power to detect dangerous lead contamination directly in families’ hands.

    What makes it revolutionary:

    • 5-minute testing time vs. weeks for traditional methods
    • Laboratory-level accuracy in a handheld device
    • Expected to be affordable for average families
    • Prevents exposure by catching problems early

    The bigger picture: This technology could help prevent future water contamination disasters by empowering communities to monitor their own water quality and take action when problems are discovered.

    What you can do now: While the E-Tongue isn’t yet commercially available, you can still protect your family by having your water tested through traditional methods if you live in an older home or have concerns about lead contamination.

    The E-Tongue proves that innovative technology can make essential health monitoring accessible to everyone. Soon, testing your water for lead might be as simple as checking your blood pressure – quick, easy, and something every family can do at home.


    Stay Informed

    • Follow the research – University of Massachusetts Lowell continues testing the E-Tongue
    • Test your water now – Don’t wait for new technology if you have current concerns
    • Know your risk – Homes built before 1986 have higher lead contamination risk
    • Support water safety – Advocate for infrastructure improvements in your community

    Sources: University of Massachusetts Lowell, ACS Omega journal, American Chemical Society, ScienceDaily | Last Updated: June 24, 2025

    Check our Water reports HERE to find out your water quality

    Check your water now!

    We have translated and compiled water reports on every state in the US, and covered over 100 cities. Find out how good your water is today!

    Glass of clean water

    Please read – our information

    The information presented on cleanairandwater.net is compiled from official water quality reports, trusted news sources, government websites, and public health resources. While we strive for accuracy and thoroughness in our presentations, we are not scientists, engineers, or qualified water quality professionals.


    Our mission is to present water quality information in an accessible, real-world format that helps people understand what’s in their water and make informed decisions about their health and safety. We believe that complex environmental information should be available to everyone in a format that’s easy to understand.


    We make every effort to ensure our content is current and accurate, but we cannot guarantee that all information is complete or error-free. This website should not replace official communications from your local water utility or health department. We always recommend consulting official sources for the most up-to-date information regarding your specific water system.


    Clean Air and Water is not liable for any unintentional errors, omissions, or outdated information. The content on this site is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered professional advice.

    Site Logo for menu
  • Scientists Investigate Whether PFAS Exposure Affects COVID Vaccine Response

    Scientists Investigate Whether PFAS Exposure Affects COVID Vaccine Response

    Scientists are asking an important question: Do “forever chemicals” in our drinking water affect how well COVID vaccines protect us? Several major research studies are investigating whether PFAS exposure might impact your immune system’s response to vaccines – and the early findings are mixed.

    Here’s what researchers have discovered so far and what it means for you.

    What Scientists Are Studying

    Researchers have long known that PFAS chemicals can mess with your immune system. Studies in children showed that higher PFAS levels led to weaker responses to vaccines for diseases like tetanus and diphtheria. Now they’re investigating whether the same thing happens with COVID vaccines.

    The big question: If nearly everyone in America has PFAS in their blood, could these chemicals be making vaccines less effective for some people?

    Why this matters: If PFAS exposure reduces vaccine effectiveness, it could help explain why some people get breakthrough infections even after vaccination. It might also mean that people with high PFAS exposure need different vaccination strategies.

    What the Research Shows So Far

    Multiple studies have looked at PFAS and COVID vaccine response, with mixed results that scientists are still trying to understand:

    Michigan Study: No Clear Effect Found

    The largest study to date, conducted by the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, followed 226 people with known PFAS exposure from contaminated drinking water. The findings were reassuring:

    • Higher PFAS levels did not reduce overall antibody response to COVID vaccines
    • PFAS didn’t affect how quickly antibodies formed after vaccination
    • PFAS didn’t change how fast antibodies declined over time
    • People with PFAS exposure still responded normally to vaccines

    3M Worker Study: Small Possible Effect

    A separate study of 3M workers (who had very high PFAS exposure from working at plants that made these chemicals) found small potential effects:

    • 3.45% lower antibody levels for each increase in PFOS exposure
    • Similar small decreases for other PFAS chemicals
    • But the effects were so small that scientists couldn’t be sure they were real

    Other Research: Mixed Signals

    Additional studies have produced varying results:

    • Some found higher PFAS linked to lower peak antibody levels after COVID infection (but not vaccination)
    • Others found no significant effects on vaccine response
    • Research is ongoing with different populations and exposure levels

    What Makes This Research Complicated

    Studying PFAS and vaccine response is tricky for several reasons:

    Everyone has different PFAS levels: Some people have much higher exposure than others, making it hard to compare groups.

    Multiple factors affect vaccine response: Age, health conditions, previous infections, and many other things influence how well vaccines work.

    PFAS are everywhere: Since nearly everyone has these chemicals in their blood, there’s no true “unexposed” group to compare against.

    Different vaccines, different responses: The immune system might respond differently to various types of vaccines.

    What We Know About PFAS and Immune System

    While the COVID vaccine research is still developing, scientists have stronger evidence that PFAS affect the immune system in general:

    Children are most affected:

    • Studies show clear connections between PFAS exposure and weaker vaccine responses in kids
    • Higher PFAS levels linked to more frequent infections
    • Children with high exposure more likely to be hospitalized for infectious diseases

    Adults show mixed results:

    • Some studies find reduced vaccine effectiveness
    • Others show no clear effects
    • More research needed to understand why results vary

    How PFAS might interfere:

    • These chemicals can suppress immune system function
    • They may reduce the body’s ability to produce protective antibodies
    • Effects appear to be stronger with higher exposure levels

    Who Might Be Most at Risk

    If PFAS do affect vaccine response, certain groups might be more vulnerable:

    People with high PFAS exposure:

    • Communities with contaminated drinking water
    • Workers in industries that use PFAS
    • People living near airports or military bases (where PFAS firefighting foam was used)
    • Residents near landfills or manufacturing plants

    First responders and military:

    • Firefighters often have very high PFAS levels
    • Military personnel exposed through firefighting foam
    • These groups are already at higher risk for COVID exposure

    Children and pregnant women:

    • Developing immune systems may be more vulnerable
    • PFAS can cross the placenta and affect babies

    What This Means for You

    While scientists continue their research, here’s what you should know:

    Don’t skip vaccination: Even if PFAS affect vaccine response, getting vaccinated is still your best protection against COVID. The benefits far outweigh any theoretical risks.

    Consider your exposure: If you live in an area with known PFAS contamination, you might want to discuss this with your doctor.

    Focus on what you can control:

    • Test your drinking water for PFAS
    • Consider water filtration systems that remove forever chemicals
    • Follow general health practices that support immune function

    Stay informed: This is active research, and recommendations may change as scientists learn more.

    The Bigger Picture

    This research is part of a larger investigation into how PFAS affect human health. The findings have implications beyond just COVID vaccines:

    Childhood vaccination programs: If PFAS reduce vaccine effectiveness in children, this could affect diseases like measles, mumps, and polio.

    Public health planning: Communities with high PFAS exposure might need different vaccination strategies.

    Environmental policy: These findings add to the evidence that PFAS contamination is a serious public health threat.

    Future vaccine development: Understanding how environmental chemicals affect immune response could help design better vaccines.

    What Researchers Are Doing Next

    Scientists are expanding their investigations:

    Larger studies: Researchers are following more people for longer periods to get clearer answers.

    Different populations: Studies are looking at various age groups and exposure levels.

    Other vaccines: Investigating whether PFAS affect response to flu vaccines, boosters, and other immunizations.

    Mechanisms: Trying to understand exactly how PFAS interfere with immune system function.

    Bottom Line: Research Continues, but Vaccines Still Work

    The scientific evidence on PFAS and COVID vaccine response is still developing. Some studies suggest small effects, while others find no clear impact. What’s certain is that vaccines remain highly effective at preventing serious illness, even in people with PFAS exposure.

    The key takeaways:

    • Current research shows mixed results about PFAS affecting vaccine response
    • Any effects appear to be small in most people
    • Vaccines are still your best protection against COVID
    • People with high PFAS exposure should discuss their individual risk with healthcare providers

    What you can do now:

    • Get vaccinated and stay up-to-date with boosters
    • Test your water for PFAS if you’re concerned about exposure
    • Consider filtration systems that remove forever chemicals
    • Support policies to reduce PFAS contamination in communities

    This research highlights why cleaning up PFAS contamination is so important. While we wait for definitive answers about vaccine effectiveness, reducing exposure to these forever chemicals benefits everyone’s health in multiple ways.

    The good news is that scientists are taking this question seriously and working to understand how environmental chemicals affect our immune systems. This research will help protect public health now and in the future.


    Stay Informed

    • Follow ongoing research – Studies continue to investigate PFAS and immune function
    • Test your water – Know your PFAS exposure levels
    • Talk to your doctor – Discuss individual risk factors and vaccination needs
    • Support clean water policies – Advocate for PFAS cleanup in your community
    • Check Your Water Quality Here

    Sources: Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, CDC, Environmental Working Group | Last Updated: June 24, 2025

    Please read – our information

    The information presented on cleanairandwater.net is compiled from official water quality reports, trusted news sources, government websites, and public health resources. While we strive for accuracy and thoroughness in our presentations, we are not scientists, engineers, or qualified water quality professionals.


    Our mission is to present water quality information in an accessible, real-world format that helps people understand what’s in their water and make informed decisions about their health and safety. We believe that complex environmental information should be available to everyone in a format that’s easy to understand.


    We make every effort to ensure our content is current and accurate, but we cannot guarantee that all information is complete or error-free. This website should not replace official communications from your local water utility or health department. We always recommend consulting official sources for the most up-to-date information regarding your specific water system.


    Clean Air and Water is not liable for any unintentional errors, omissions, or outdated information. The content on this site is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered professional advice.

    Site Logo for menu