When you turned on your tap this morning, you probably didn’t think about the material of the pipe between the street and your kitchen. For most people, water just arrives – clear, cold, and seemingly simple. But for millions of American homes, that last stretch of pipe has quietly been made of one of the most problematic materials in the modern water system: lead.
In late 2024, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized the Lead and Copper Rule Improvements (LCRI) – a sweeping update that effectively tells water systems: find your lead service lines and get them out of the ground within about a decade. EPA+1
It’s not a flashy change. There are no ribbon-cuttings for removed pipes. Instead, the shift arrives as compliance dates, inventories, and replacement plans. But taken together, it may end up being one of the biggest public-health projects in U.S. infrastructure history.
Why the New Rule Is Such a Big Deal
Lead in drinking water has been a known hazard for decades. Even low-level exposure can affect children’s brain development and behaviour, and increase cardiovascular and kidney risks in adults. There is no safe level of lead.
Under the old framework, water systems could leave lead service lines in place as long as corrosion-control treatment kept test results under a 15 parts per billion (ppb) action level. The new LCRI changes that balance in several important ways:
- It requires drinking-water systems to identify and replace all lead service lines and “galvanized requiring replacement” (GRR) lines under their control within 10 years of the compliance date. EPA+2AIHA+2
- It lowers the lead action level from 15 ppb to 10 ppb, meaning more systems will be pushed to act when lead shows up at the tap. AE2S+3AIHA+3CDA Blog+3
- It tightens tap-sampling rules, requiring paired first- and fifth-liter samples at homes served by lead service lines, and using the higher of the two results to judge compliance. Bricker Graydon+3Montana DEQ+3CDM Smith+3
- It strengthens public-communication and education requirements so that households are told more clearly if they have, or may have, lead service lines. EPA+2theupdate.ae2s.com+2
The rule was finalized in October 2024. The EPA has set a compliance date of November 1, 2027, after which the 10-year replacement clock begins. For most systems, that means a practical replacement deadline around the end of 2037, with a very small number of systems eligible for extra time if they can prove they’re already replacing at the fastest feasible pace. Edward Jones+2EPA+2
In other words: by the late 2030s, the federal aim is that lead service lines should largely be gone from American drinking-water systems.
The First Big Step: Figuring Out Where the Lead Pipes Are
You can’t remove what you can’t find.
Before anyone can start large-scale replacement, water systems have to know which properties are connected by lead service lines. That’s why a previous update, the 2021 Lead and Copper Rule Revisions (LCRR), required community and non-transient non-community systems to submit an initial service-line inventory by October 16, 2024. Mrwa+1
Those inventories don’t magically map every single pipe. Many lines are still marked as “unknown” because records from the mid-20th century are incomplete or inconsistent. But they create a baseline:
- Which addresses definitely have lead service lines.
- Which have non-lead lines.
- Which still need investigation.
The LCRI builds directly on that work. Now systems must keep updating those inventories, make them public, and pair them with a written replacement plan – not just a spreadsheet, but a strategy: which lines get done first, how the work is sequenced, and how homeowners will be informed and supported. theupdate.ae2s.com+2EPA+2
A 10-Year Race – With Some Complex Obstacles
On paper, “10 years to replace the pipes” sounds straightforward. In practice, it’s a national challenge. EPA and sector analyses estimate there are roughly 9 million–9.2 million lead service lines still in use across the U.S. AIHA+1
For each one, utilities must work through a familiar but messy list of questions:
- Does the line run partly under public streets and partly under private property?
- Does the water system have legal authority – and funding – to replace both sections?
- How do you coordinate street closures, crews, and homeowner schedules without overwhelming local budgets or residents’ patience?
The LCRI only counts full replacements of the service line under system control. Partial replacements – where only the public side is swapped out and the private side is left lead – generally don’t count toward the 10-year requirement and can temporarily spike lead levels if not handled carefully. theupdate.ae2s.com+2Bricker Graydon+2
For smaller or under-resourced systems, especially those with older housing stock and limited staffing, this is a huge lift. The rule allows some flexibility and limited deadline deferrals for systems with unusually high concentrations of lead lines, but the default expectation is clear: steady, visible progress at something like 10% of lines per year. EPA+2CDA Blog+2
Flint as a Preview, Not an Exception
If you want to see what an end-to-end lead-line replacement effort looks like, Flint, Michigan, is a sobering but useful case study.
After its 2014 water-supply switch and subsequent contamination crisis, Flint was placed under a court-ordered settlement to remove lead service lines. By 2024–2025, state and local reports show that more than 98% of residential lead service lines had been replaced, with around 11,000 lead lines removed and over 28,000 properties excavated and checked. The Washington Post+3Michigan+3Michigan+3
Flint’s journey has taken nearly a decade and was driven by intense public pressure, legal action, and state-level support. It shows both sides of the story the rest of the country now faces under LCRI:
- It’s possible to replace lead service lines at scale.
- It is not quick, cheap, or simple – especially when records are incomplete and communities have lost trust in official assurances. AP News
Under the new federal rule, cities that have already done this work – Flint, Newark, and a handful of others – are effectively ahead of schedule. For everyone else, Flint is a warning: delays, confusion, and poor communication make an already-hard job much harder.
What Changes for Households Over the Next Decade
Most of the LCRI work will happen behind the scenes, but for individual households, a few things will become more common in the coming years:
- More detailed notices from your water system about whether your home is connected by a lead, non-lead, or “unknown” service line – and what’s planned next. theupdate.ae2s.com+2CDA Blog+2
- Requests for access so crews can verify your service line material or carry out a replacement.
- Tighter sampling programmes, especially in neighbourhoods with known lead lines: paired first- and fifth-liter samples, and faster reporting of results. Montana DEQ+2CDM Smith+2
Until a line is replaced, lead exposure remains a possibility. So for homes known or suspected to have lead service lines, utilities and health agencies often recommend interim steps such as using certified lead-reducing filters, running cold water before drinking, and avoiding hot tap water for cooking – especially for infants and pregnant people. (Local guidance varies, and residents should always follow their utility or health department’s official advice.)
The LCRI itself also pushes systems to improve public education, including providing clearer language about lead risks in Consumer Confidence Reports and offering filters in some higher-risk situations. theupdate.ae2s.com+2CDA Blog+2
Policy on Paper vs. Pipes in the Ground
On paper, the future is encouraging:
- A lower action level that triggers action sooner.
- An aggressive 10-year replacement mandate for lead and GRR lines.
- Better sampling that is less likely to miss real-world lead problems at the tap.
In practice, the outcome will depend heavily on funding, local capacity, and political will. If utilities and regulators follow through, the LCRI could mean that children born in the 2030s grow up in a country where lead service lines are mostly a historical footnote.
If implementation falters – through underfunding, legal delays, or patchy enforcement – pockets of lead risk could persist long after the deadlines. The rule creates the framework; the hard work is turning that framework into safe water in every kitchen.
For now, though, one thing has clearly shifted:
The federal government is no longer treating lead pipes as a problem to be managed indefinitely. It is treating them as a problem to be removed.
Sources & Notes
Flint, Michigan case study – state and advocacy reports documenting nearly 11,000 lead lines replaced, >98% of residential lines removed, and the city’s multi-year compliance with lead standards. AP News+4Michigan+4Michigan+4
EPA – Lead and Copper Rule Improvements (LCRI), rule summary and fact sheets, October 2024. Key points: final rule issued Oct 8, 2024; systems must identify and replace lead service lines within 10 years; stronger sampling and communication requirements. EPA+2EPA+2
Action level and sampling changes – multiple technical summaries confirming: lowered lead action level to 10 ppb, paired first- and fifth-liter samples at LSL sites, higher result used for compliance. Montana DEQ+4AIHA+4CDA Blog+4
Initial service-line inventories and timelines – LCRR requirement for inventories by Oct 16, 2024; LCRI compliance date Nov 1, 2027; 10-year replacement window to ~2037. Mrwa+2CDA Blog+2
Scale of the problem – EPA and sector estimates of ~9–9.2 million lead service lines nationwide, and minimum 10% annual replacement pacing. CDA Blog+3AIHA+3EPA+3
Check your water now!
We have translated and compiled water reports on every state in the US, and covered over 100 cities. Find out how good your water is today!

Please read – our information
The information presented on cleanairandwater.net is compiled from official water quality reports, trusted news sources, government websites, and public health resources. While we strive for accuracy and thoroughness in our presentations, we are not scientists, engineers, or qualified water quality professionals.
Our mission is to present water quality information in an accessible, real-world format that helps people understand what’s in their water and make informed decisions about their health and safety. We believe that complex environmental information should be available to everyone in a format that’s easy to understand.
We make every effort to ensure our content is current and accurate, but we cannot guarantee that all information is complete or error-free. This website should not replace official communications from your local water utility or health department. We always recommend consulting official sources for the most up-to-date information regarding your specific water system.
Clean Air and Water is not liable for any unintentional errors, omissions, or outdated information. The content on this site is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered professional advice.













